Language is widely distributed throughout the brain

Language in a vat?

Empirical evidence from modern neuroimaging suggests that functional localization inadequately explains brain–behaviour relations: local regions perform multiple functions determined by connectivity across complex subnetworks, distributed throughout the whole brain2,3. Yet Fedorenko et al. argue that the brain shows no sensitivity to linguistic variables outside the ‘language network’, making it a neural ‘natural kind’1. As an ‘intuition pump’4, does this mean we could excise the ‘language network’, put it in a vat and feed it text, and it would still comprehend language? This seems implausible, especially considering there is no fixed definition of language, and language itself is not thought to be a natural kind5. As elaborated below, neither the methods nor evidence for the ‘language network’ support the modular ‘natural kind’ conclusion.

Averaging and evidence

Using a ‘language localizer’ to define the ‘language network’ is tautological. The circularity takes the following form: the language network is defined as activity resulting from connected compared to noisy or scrambled language, and language selectivity is then tested in these same regions. Further, such methods create an exaggerated impression of selectivity because they average across tens of thousands of positive and negative voxel-wise ‘activity’ or connectivity values and many different cytoarchitectonic and functional zones within the identified (non)-‘language’ regions1. Rather, this isolated ‘language network’ only appears when averaging over data resulting from heterogeneous linguistic representations and processes unfolding over multiple timescales6,7,8. When these have been considered individually (such as with different syntactic forms), they are shown to be distributed across the entire brain6,7,8,9. Last, the stimuli and tasks used in this approach do not consider language as we comprehend and produce it in daily life (as a multimodal, socially embedded phenomenon). As such, the resulting ‘language network’ is ‘defined’ in a manner that scarcely resembles what most would endorse as language.

Alternatives

Thus, despite the large number of studies using the ‘language localizer’ approach, results do not necessarily constitute evidence for a ‘language network’. Alternative neurobiological models should account for both the ‘language localizer’ and distributed language data and language as a real-world activity6. The apparent specialization of regions in the ‘language network’ might reflect the frequent engagement of these regions due to their connectivity and role within task-relevant networks, but this does not limit them to language processing alone. Hence, the ‘language network’ could more simply be conceived of as a collection of hierarchically organized auditory association cortices communicating with functional connectivity hubs that coordinate a whole-brain distribution of contextually determined and, thus, highly variable ‘peripheral’ regions (with a similar model able to account for signed languages)6,7,10.

We suspect that studies incorporating natural language comprehension and production, fewer subtractions, less averaging, and more individual, spatiotemporal and network analyses will demonstrate that the neurobiology of language does not operate in a vat. It is widely distributed across the brain.

There is a reply to this letter by Fedorenko, E., Ivanova, A. A. & Regev, T. I. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00904-z (2025).

Related Articles

Latent circuit inference from heterogeneous neural responses during cognitive tasks

Higher cortical areas carry a wide range of sensory, cognitive and motor signals mixed in heterogeneous responses of single neurons tuned to multiple task variables. Dimensionality reduction methods that rely on correlations between neural activity and task variables leave unknown how heterogeneous responses arise from connectivity to drive behavior. We develop the latent circuit model, a dimensionality reduction approach in which task variables interact via low-dimensional recurrent connectivity to produce behavioral output. We apply the latent circuit inference to recurrent neural networks trained to perform a context-dependent decision-making task and find a suppression mechanism in which contextual representations inhibit irrelevant sensory responses. We validate this mechanism by confirming the behavioral effects of patterned connectivity perturbations predicted by the latent circuit model. We find similar suppression of irrelevant sensory responses in the prefrontal cortex of monkeys performing the same task. We show that incorporating causal interactions among task variables is critical for identifying behaviorally relevant computations from neural response data.

A reform of value-added taxes on foods can have health, environmental and economic benefits in Europe

Fiscal policies can provide important incentives for encouraging the dietary changes needed to achieve global policy targets. Across Europe, the foods relevant to health and the environment often incur reduced but non-zero value-added tax (VAT) rates at about half the maximum rates, which allows for providing both incentives and disincentives. Integrating economic, health and environmental modelling, we show that reforming VAT rates on foods, including increasing rates on meat and dairy, and reducing VAT rates on fruits and vegetables can improve diets and result in health, environmental and economic benefits in most European countries. The health improvements were primarily driven by reductions in VAT rates on fruits and vegetables, whereas most of the environmental and revenue benefits were driven by increased rates on meat and dairy. Our findings suggest that differentiating VAT rates based on health and environmental considerations can support changes towards healthier and more sustainable diets in Europe.

Simultaneous tACS-fMRI reveals state- and frequency-specific modulation of hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity

Non-invasive indirect hippocampal-targeted stimulation is of broad scientific and clinical interest. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is appealing because it allows oscillatory stimulation to study hippocampal theta (3–8 Hz) activity. We found that tACS administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging yielded a frequency-, mental state- and topologically-specific effect of theta stimulation (but not other frequencies) enhancing right (but not left) hippocampal-cortical connectivity during resting blocks but not during task blocks. Control analyses showed that this effect was not due to possible stimulation-induced changes in signal quality or head movement. Our findings are promising for targeted network modulations of deep brain structures for research and clinical intervention.

Innovating beyond electrophysiology through multimodal neural interfaces

Neural circuits distributed across different brain regions mediate how neural information is processed and integrated, resulting in complex cognitive capabilities and behaviour. To understand dynamics and interactions of neural circuits, it is crucial to capture the complete spectrum of neural activity, ranging from the fast action potentials of individual neurons to the population dynamics driven by slow brain-wide oscillations. In this Review, we discuss how advances in electrical and optical recording technologies, coupled with the emergence of machine learning methodologies, present a unique opportunity to unravel the complex dynamics of the brain. Although great progress has been made in both electrical and optical neural recording technologies, these alone fail to provide a comprehensive picture of the neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution. To address this challenge, multimodal experiments integrating the complementary advantages of different techniques hold great promise. However, they are still hindered by the absence of multimodal data analysis methods capable of providing unified and interpretable explanations of the complex neural dynamics distinctly encoded in these modalities. Combining multimodal studies with advanced data analysis methods will offer novel perspectives to address unresolved questions in basic neuroscience and to develop treatments for various neurological disorders.

Self-reports map the landscape of task states derived from brain imaging

Psychological states influence our happiness and productivity; however, estimates of their impact have historically been assumed to be limited by the accuracy with which introspection can quantify them. Over the last two decades, studies have shown that introspective descriptions of psychological states correlate with objective indicators of cognition, including task performance and metrics of brain function, using techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Such evidence suggests it may be possible to quantify the mapping between self-reports of experience and objective representations of those states (e.g., those inferred from measures of brain activity). Here, we used machine learning to show that self-reported descriptions of experiences across tasks can reliably map the objective landscape of task states derived from brain activity. In our study, 194 participants provided descriptions of their psychological states while performing tasks for which the contribution of different brain systems was available from prior fMRI studies. We used machine learning to combine these reports with descriptions of brain function to form a ‘state-space’ that reliably predicted patterns of brain activity based solely on unseen descriptions of experience (N = 101). Our study demonstrates that introspective reports can share information with the objective task landscape inferred from brain activity.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *