Related Articles
DJK-5, an anti-biofilm peptide, increases Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity to colistin killing in co-biofilms with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Chronic infections represent a significant global health and economic challenge. Biofilms, which are bacterial communities encased in an extracellular polysaccharide matrix, contribute to approximately 80% of these infections. In particular, pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are frequently co-isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis and are commonly found in chronic wound infections. Within biofilms, bacteria demonstrate a remarkable increase in resistance and tolerance to antimicrobial treatment. We investigated the efficacy of combining the last-line antibiotic colistin with a membrane- and stringent stress response-targeting anti-biofilm peptide DJK-5 against co-biofilms comprised of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Colistin lacks canonical activity against S. aureus. However, our study revealed that under co-biofilm conditions, the antibiofilm peptide DJK-5 synergized with colistin against S. aureus. Similar enhancement was observed when daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide against Gram-positive bacteria, was combined with DJK-5, resulting in increased activity against P. aeruginosa. The combinatorial treatment induced morphological changes in both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus cell shape and size within co-biofilms. Importantly, our findings also demonstrate synergistic activity against both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in a murine subcutaneous biofilm-like abscess model. In conclusion, combinatorial treatments with colistin or daptomycin and the anti-biofilm peptide DJK-5 show significant potential for targeting co-biofilm infections. These findings offer promising avenues for developing new therapeutic approaches to combat complex chronic infections.
Type 2 immunity in allergic diseases
Significant advancements have been made in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of type 2 immunity in allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), food and drug allergies, and atopic dermatitis (AD). Type 2 immunity has evolved to protect against parasitic diseases and toxins, plays a role in the expulsion of parasites and larvae from inner tissues to the lumen and outside the body, maintains microbe-rich skin and mucosal epithelial barriers and counterbalances the type 1 immune response and its destructive effects. During the development of a type 2 immune response, an innate immune response initiates starting from epithelial cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), including dendritic cells and macrophages, and translates to adaptive T and B-cell immunity, particularly IgE antibody production. Eosinophils, mast cells and basophils have effects on effector functions. Cytokines from ILC2s and CD4+ helper type 2 (Th2) cells, CD8 + T cells, and NK-T cells, along with myeloid cells, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, initiate and sustain allergic inflammation via T cell cells, eosinophils, and ILC2s; promote IgE class switching; and open the epithelial barrier. Epithelial cell activation, alarmin release and barrier dysfunction are key in the development of not only allergic diseases but also many other systemic diseases. Recent biologics targeting the pathways and effector functions of IL4/IL13, IL-5, and IgE have shown promising results for almost all ages, although some patients with severe allergic diseases do not respond to these therapies, highlighting the unmet need for a more detailed and personalized approach.
Atopic disease and astigmatism: a population-based study
To assess the relationship between atopic disease and astigmatism in adolescence and young adulthood.
Infected wound repair correlates with collagen I induction and NOX2 activation by cold atmospheric plasma
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a promising complement to tissue repair and regenerative medicine approaches. CAP has therapeutic potential in infected cutaneous wounds by mechanisms which remain enigmatic. Here, CAP is shown to activate phagocyte NADPH oxidase complex NOX2. CAP induced increased intracellular reactive oxygen species, alleviated by NOX2 inhibitors. Genetic and pharmacological inhibitions of NOX2 in macrophages and bioengineered skin infected with Staphylococcus aureus and treated with CAP reduced intracellular oxidants and increased bacterial survival. CAP triggered Rac activation and phosphorylation of p40phox and p47phox required for NOX2 assembly and activity. Furthermore, CAP induced collagen I expression by fibroblasts. Infection and healing kinetics showed that murine skin wounds infected with S. aureus and treated with CAP are characterized by decreased bacterial burden, increased length of neoepidermis and extracellular matrix formation. Collectively, our findings identify mechanisms triggered by CAP that subdue infection and result in enhanced repair following skin injury.
Resistance to linezolid in Staphylococcus aureus by mutation, modification, and acquisition of genes
Linezolid binds to the 50S subunit of the bacterial ribosome, inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis by preventing the formation of the initiation complex. Oxazolidinone antimicrobial drugs represent the last line of defense in treating Staphylococcus aureus infections; thus, resistance to linezolid in S. aureus warrants high priority. This article examines the major mechanisms of resistance to linezolid in S. aureus, which include: mutations in the domain V of 23S rRNA (primarily G2576); chromosomal mutations in the rplC, rplD, and rplV genes (encoding the ribosomal uL3, uL4, and uL22 proteins, respectively); the exogenous acquisition of the methylase encoded by the chloramphenicol-florfenicol resistance (cfr) gene; the endogenous methylation or demethylation of 23S rRNA; the acquisition of optrA and poxtA resistance genes; and the existence of the LmrS multidrug efflux pump. In conclusion, these mechanisms mediate resistance through mutations or modifications to the bacterial target, thereby reducing the affinity of linezolid for the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) binding site or by preventing the binding of linezolid to the PTC through a ribosomal protective effect. The existence of additional, unexplained resistance mechanisms requires further investigation and verification.
Responses