Redox-active inverse crowns for small molecule activation

Main

Mixing of metal complexes to achieve unique reactivity dates back to the time of Georg Wittig1. Despite this early start, (hetero)bimetallic cooperation is not outdated but is an integral part of contemporary chemistry2. Even when restricted to only s-block metals, many powerful combinations exist that are fundamental to the development of Turbo-Hauser bases3,4, Turbo-Grignard reagents5,6 or the nBuLi/KOtBu superbase7,8,9. Metal cooperation is also the key to Mulvey’s inverse crown complexes10. Highlights of this work include the selective fourfold 1,1′,3,3′-deprotonation of ferrocene by MgNa(NiPr2)3 (ref. 11; Fig. 1a) and the meta-selective double deprotonation of N,N-dimethylaniline by Mg2Na4(TMP)6(nBu)2 (TMP, tetramethylpiperidine), which strongly contrasts with the normal ortho-directed deprotonation12,13 (Fig. 1b). The latter’s abnormal selectivity can be explained by the self-assembly of the inverse crown around Me2NC6H32 during the deprotonation process. With a rare exception of a preformed inverse crown base14, the formation of the inverse crown complexes is a dynamic process in which the size of the anion determines composition and ring diameter.

Fig. 1: Syntheses of inverse crown complexes.
figure 1

a, Selective fourfold 1,1′,3,3′-deprotonation of ferrocene11. b, The meta-selective double deprotonation of N,N-dimethylaniline13 versus directed ortho metallation. TMEDA, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine. c, Formation of the mixed-metal aggregate II from I and (CaN′′2)2 and synthesis of the redox-active inverse crown 1.

Full size image

Herein we merge the fields of metallacrowns15 and low-valent s-block metal chemistry16,17,18 by reporting a preformed inverse crown consisting of Na+ cations and a redox-active Mg0 centre. The zero-valent nature of the Mg0 atom enables the reduction of substrates to give anionic moieties that are encapsulated in an inverse crown complex. The current work is based on our recently reported sodium magnesyl dimer [(BDI*)MgNa]2 (I; BDI*, bulky β-diketiminate ligand; ref. 19; Fig. 1c). Calculations suggest that I is best described as being constructed of two (BDI*)Mg magnesyl anions that are bridged by Na+ cations. Supporting the idea that (BDI*)Mg behaves like an anionic ligand is the observation that the addition of dimeric (CaN′′2)2 led to exclusive formation of the mixed aggregate (BDI*)MgNa/CaN′′2 with a unique Mg–Ca bond (II; N′′, N(SiMe3)2)20. As the electronegativity difference of Mg and Ca is only small, some electron transfer from the electron-rich Mg0 centre to the Ca2+ centre is observed. Herein we report that a mixture of [(BDI*)MgNa]2 and NaN′′, which forms a cyclic trimer in the solid state21, resulted in exclusive formation of 1 (Fig. 1c), which is shown to be a preformed redox-active inverse crown.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and properties of the inverse Mg0Na+
3 crown (1)

Reaction of a dark-brown solution of I in methylcyclohexane-d14 with 1.33 equiv. trimeric (NaN′′)3 led to an immediate colour change to red. A 1H NMR analysis and single-crystal X-ray diffraction show exclusive formation of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1; Fig. 2), which as a crude product is essentially pure. Different I/(NaN′′)3 ratios repeatedly led to the same product, indicating that cyclic 1 is a privileged structure. Substitution of a second N′′ anion for (BDI*)Mg is not observed, likely for steric reasons.

Fig. 2: Reactivity of sodium magnesyl complex I and inverse crown 1.
figure 2

Whereas I reacted unselectively, reactions with inverse crown 1 are generally quantitative and highly selective on account of anion stabilization by the inverse crown of metals.

Full size image

The asymmetric unit in the crystal structure of 1 contains three independent but structurally similar inverse crown aggregates (Fig. 3a). The common feature is the six-membered Mg–Na–N–Na–N–Na ring in which (BDI*)Mg and N′′ anions are bridged by Na+ cations. The Mg–N bonds to the BDI* ligand are unusually long (2.119(3)–2.140(3) Å) and indicative of the low oxidation state on the formally zero-valent Mg centre. Similarly, long Mg–N bonds have been observed in I (average, 2.117 Å). The Mg–Na distances vary from 3.261(2) to 3.407(2) Å and are in the range of those in I (3.1216(7) and 3.4529(7) Å). The shortest Mg–Na bond is close to the sum of Bragg’s metal radii for Na and Mg (3.19 Å)22. Although Na3 is slightly bent inward, the diagonal Mg–Na distances of 3.926(3)–4.396(3) Å are too long to be considered bonding. Additional Ar···Na+ contacts are defined by short ring(centroid)···Na+ distances (2.626(2)–2.735(2) Å) that are only slightly longer than that in I (2.604(1) Å).

Fig. 3: Crystal structures.
figure 3

a, (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1). b, (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2). c, (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2(O2) (5). d, (BDI*)MgNa4N′′3(N2O2) (6). The Et groups of the Et2(H)C substituents and H atoms are not shown for clarity. Bond distances and ranges are shown in angstroms.

Full size image

Like precursor I, solutions of 1 are highly air sensitive and can react with the solvent. A red tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution of 1 immediately turned yellow. Deaggregation likely precedes decomposition. The 1H NMR and X-ray diffraction analyses are consistent with the formation of (BDI*)Na(THF)x, (NaN′′)3 and a reactive grey powder that is consistent with Mg0 precipitation (Supplementary Figs. 46, 68 and 69). As previously observed19,23, such unusual separation of metallic Na0 or Mg0 from low-valent Mg/Na complexes can be induced by heating or addition of a Lewis base. Also, a red benzene solution of 1 slowly changed colour to yellow under the formation of a white precipitate. The 1H NMR analysis showed formation of (BDI*)MgPh, indicating reductive C–H bond activation, the precipitate likely being insoluble metal hydride. However, a cyclohexane-d12 solution of 1 even after 3 weeks does not show any signs of decomposition and is also thermally stable up to +60 °C. NMR spectra of 1 in cyclohexane-d12 are in accordance with the C2v-symmetric crystal structure. As signals for I or (NaN′′)3 could not be observed, there is no ion scrambling. By stark contrast, a cyclohexane-d12 solution of I decomposes at 25 °C within 34 h.

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3PW91-D3BJ/def2tzvp//B3PW91-D3BJ/def2svp level of theory reproduced the experimentally observed geometry of 1 (Supplementary Fig. 71). Minor differences are found for the calculated Mg–Na bonds (3.137–3.174 Å), which are shorter than experimentally observed (average, 3.344 Å), and the position of Na3, which is calculated to bend slightly outward instead of inward, demonstrating the flexibility of the ring. The quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) confirms Mg–Na bonding by bond paths and bond critical points (bcps) at the Mg–Na axes (Fig. 4a). However, the electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian 2ρ(r) in the bcps are low, indicating a weak electrostatic interaction (r = vector space). The Laplacian of the electron distribution shows accumulation of electron density at the Mg nucleus. This is confirmed by natural population analysis (NPA), which calculates a very low charge of +0.58 at Mg that agrees with the formal Mg0 assignment. Charges at the connected Na atoms (+0.71/+0.73) are unusually low, whereas the +0.92 charge on the remote Na3 is in the normal range for a Na+ cation. This charge distribution is comparable to that in I (Mg, +0.57; Na, +0.74) and in line with partial Mg0 → Na+ electron transfer due to the small difference in their Pauling electronegativities (Mg, 1.31; Na, 0.93)24.

Fig. 4: DFT calculations and QTAIM analyses.
figure 4

a, Laplacian distribution for (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) showing bcps (light blue) with ρ(r) (e B−3 in red boxes), the Laplacian 2ρ(r) (e B−5 in green boxes) and NPA charges (blue boxes). b, Laplacian distribution for (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2). c, Energy profile for the reaction of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) with N2O to give (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2). ΔH, the change in enthalpy, and ΔG, the change in Gibbs free energy calculated at 298 K (in parentheses) are given in kilocalories per mole, and distances are given in angstroms. NPA charges are shown in blue boxes. A, B, C and E are true minima and D* is a transition state.

Full size image

Reactivity of the inverse Mg0Na+
3 crown (1)

The redox reactivity of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) was evaluated in the reduction of N2O. This potent greenhouse gas, responsible for global warming and ozone depletion, is thermodynamically a strong oxidizing agent, but high kinetic stability hampers its use25,26. Saturating a dark-red solution of 1 in methylcyclohexane-d14 at −80 °C with N2O led to an immediate colour change to yellow. The 1H NMR analysis confirmed the quantitative formation of an essentially pure crude product that was identified as the expected product of oxidation: (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2; Fig. 3b). The geometry of 2 shows strong similarities with that of 1. The magnesium centre is oxidized to Mg2+ and the O2 anion is encapsulated in the inverse Mg2+Na+3 crown. Although the Mg···Na distances (3.182(2)–3.22(2) Å) are shorter than those in 1, due to loss of two valence electrons at Mg, there is no bonding. This is confirmed by QTAIM analysis of the calculated structure (Fig. 4b), which does not show Mg–Na bond paths. Instead, the complex is stabilized by Ar···Na bonding, for which bond paths were observed. The crystal structure shows short ring(centroid)···Na+ distances of 2.662(2) to 2.831(17) Å.

The Na–O distances in 2 vary from 2.173(2) to 2.314(3) Å and are much longer than the Mg–O bond of 1.821(1) Å, which is among the shortest reported. It is significantly shorter than that of 1.8673(9) Å in a Mg2Na2(TMP)4O inverse crown complex with a comparable tetra-coordinated μ4-O2 anion27. Despite the four-fold coordination, it is of similar length to those in LMg(μ2-O)MgL complexes (L, anionic ligand) in which O2− is only two-coordinated (Mg–O, 1.8080(5)–1.8380(6) Å)28,29. The prominence of the Mg–O bond in 2 is supported by QTAIM analysis (Fig. 4b): the electron density in the Mg–O bcp is two to three times larger than that in the Na–O bcps. The positive Laplacian of +0.58 is in line with a highly ionic Mg2+O2 bond, which is supported by high NPA charges at Mg (+1.88) and O (−1.85). Complex 2 could be considered a hitherto unobserved (BDI*)MgO anion that is stabilized by a [Na–N′′–Na–N′′]+ chain.

The importance of product stabilization is illustrated by the strikingly different reactivities of 1 and I with N2O. Whereas 1 cleanly reacted by O incorporation to give 2, reaction of I gave a complex mixture of products, of which one was identified as complex 4 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Tentatively, formation of 4 can be realized by prior formation of the intermediate [(BDI*)MgONa+]2 (3). Lacking stabilization by an inverse crown arrangement, 3 decomposes instantaneously, for example, by deprotonation of the Et2CH substituent to give 4. Interestingly, this substituent is deprotonated in a terminal Me group and not in the more acidic benzylic position. Similar uncommon selectivity has been noticed previously for inverse crown complexes13 (compare with Fig. 1b). The difference in stability of 2 and 3 illustrates the importance of the inverse crown template in 2. An alumoxane anion (LAlO, where L is a dianionic bis-amide ligand) that is similar to the (BDI*)MgO anion in 3 was recently isolated in the form of a dimeric K salt, [(LAlO)K+]2 (ref. 30). Its higher stability is explained by the lower polarity of the Al–O bond compared to Mg–O and tight LAlO···K+ contacts. Removal of K+ led to a similar internal alkyl deprotonation. Also, Jones’s MgI complex (DIPPBDI)MgMg(DIPPBDI) (DIPPBDI, HC[C(Me)N(DIPP)]2; DIPP, 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) reacted unselectively with N2O, giving analytically impure mixtures of (DIPPBDI)Mg(μ2-O)Mg(DIPPBDI) and the hydroxide complex (DIPPBDI)Mg(μ2-OH)2Mg(DIPPBDI) (ref. 29).

Reaction of 1 with N2O could be described as reduce-and-capture reactivity: the product of reduction (O2) is captured in the inverse crown. An overlay of the partial structures of 1 and 2 (Fig. 5) shows that the atomic positions hardly change. Thus, the reduction of 1 follows the principle of least motion. Such reactions are generally extremely facile and selective31.

Fig. 5: Partial crystal structures of 1 (black) and 2 (light grey).
figure 5

Fitting the structures on top of each other shows that only minimal structural changes occur upon oxidation.

Full size image

The mechanism for the reduction of 1 with N2O was studied by DFT calculations (Fig. 4c). Starting with the inverse crown 1 (A), coordination of N2O is slightly endothermic (B), and O=N=N···Na bonding to the Na centre flanking Mg0 is slightly favoured over alternative N=N=O···Na bonding, which is 0.3 kcal mol−1 higher in energy (B′ in Supplementary Fig. 73). The key step is the two electron (2e) transfer from Mg0 to N2O, which forms a N2O2 dianion that is encapsulated within the plane of the inverse crown (C). Alternatively, the N2O2 dianion can also be encapsulated perpendicularly with respect to the MgNa3 cycle (C′ in Supplementary Fig. 73), but this minimum is 21.7 kcal mol−1 higher in energy than C. The NPA charges (Mg, +1.73; N2O, –1.73) and elongated N–N and N–O distances in C confirm the formal 2e reduction of N2O. As this step is extremely exothermic on account of the favourable encapsulation of N2O2 in the MgNa3 cycle (B → C; change in enthalpy ΔH = −82.6 kcal mol−1), its transition state is expected to be extremely early and close to B. Although we could not locate this state, a transition state starting from the alternative 1(N2O) complex B′ with N=N=O···Na coordination has been located. As expected, this is a very early transition state with a barrier of only +4.1 kcal mol−1. The barrier for subsequent N2 release is even lower (C → D*; ΔH = +2.0 kcal mol−1) and results in further energy release (C → E; ΔH = −38.9 kcal mol−1). The enormous exothermicity for the reaction, 1 + N2O → 2 + N2H = −120.4 kcal mol−1), underscores the strongly reducing power of atomic Mg0 and the efficient stabilization of O2 in the inverse crown complex.

Intermediate C with the unusual N-nitrosoimide N2O2 dianion is thermodynamically a highly stable species but kinetically prone to facile N2 loss. Note that N2O2 is isoelectronic to neutral ozone (O3) or to carbonite, the dianion of carbon dioxide (CO22), which has been proposed to be a crucial intermediate in the reduction of CO2 (ref. 32). A very early claim for carbonite in the form of a blue-black caesium salt (Cs2CO2; ref. 33) has been corroborated by low-temperature matrix isolation34. By contrast, there is no experimental evidence for ionic salts with the N2O2 dianion. Rare examples of transition metal complexes of the notoriously poor ligand N2O include end-on or side-on coordination34,35 and, although there is some metal → N2O e transfer, such complexes should be described with covalent synergistic bonding models36,37. The near barrier-free release of N2 from N2O2 in intermediate C (Fig. 4c) contrasts with the high kinetic stability of neutral N2O. All attempts to optimize any of the intermediates B, C or D* without the stabilizing Na–N′′–Na–N′′–Na chain, that is, (BDI*)Mg···(N2O), led to immediate N2 release and the formation of (BDI*)MgO. This illustrates that the crown of metals is able to stabilize intermediates on the pathway.

The inverse crown (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) also shows highly reducing activity in the deoxygenation of epoxides. Reacting a dark-red solution of 1 in cyclohexane-d12 with propylene oxide at 20 °C led to immediate discolouration and quantitative conversion to 2 and propene (Fig. 2). This smooth and selective reaction stands in strong contrast with Wittig’s first report on the deoxygenation of activated epoxides with Ph3P, which needed temperatures of at least 200 °C (ref. 38). Although I also reduced propylene oxide already at room temperature, this led to formation of a large variety of decomposition products. The selective deoxygenation of epoxides with 1 to give 2 and the corresponding alkene is a general reaction and is also smooth for other monosubstituted epoxides like 1-hexylene oxide or styrene oxide (the styrene product partially oligomerized), and for 1,2-disubstituted epoxides like cis– and trans-stilbene oxides (Supplementary Figs. 50–59). As cis– and trans-stilbene oxides both reacted to trans-stilbene, the reaction is not concerted. We propose reductive C–O bond cleavage to give a Na–C–C–O–Mg intermediate, which then loses alkene to give 2.

Reaction of 1 with an excess of dry O2 selectively led to quantitative formation of the peroxide complex (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2(O2) (5). Its crystal structure (Fig. 3c) shows a O22 dianion (O–O, 1.581(2)–1.588(2) Å) that is encapsulated in the inverse crown complex by side-on bonding to Mg2+ and three Na+ cations. While the Mg–O bonds in 5 are in a narrow range (1.947(1)–1.953(1) Å), much more discrepancy exists in the considerably longer Na–O bonds (2.324(1)–2.757(2) Å), indicating that the Mg–O contact is the principal bond. With an average length of 1.948 Å, it is significantly shorter than the average Mg–O bond in the inverse crown complex Mg2K2N′′44-O2) (2.013 Å)39, and even than that in a (DIPPBDI)Mg(μ2-O2)Mg(DIPPBDI) complex (1.961 Å) with only three-coordinated O atoms29. The peroxide anion O22 in 5 can be further reduced to O2 by reaction with 1 to give 2 (Supplementary Information).

In contrast to the highly selective oxidation of 1 to 5, the oxidation of a MgN′′2/NaN′′ mixture with dry air gave poor yields (5–12%) of an inverse Mg2Na2N′′4 crown encapsulating a O22/O2 mixture in a 32:68 ratio40. By comparison, in the very first report of an inverse crown ether complex, obtained after oxidation of a MgN′′2/LiN′′ mixture by air, isolated yields of 1–5% were also reported41. Oxidation of complex (DIPPBDI)MgMg (DIPPBDI) with O2 gave (DIPPBDI)Mg(μ2-O2)Mg(DIPPBDI), which could be isolated only in the form of impure reaction mixtures29. Similarly, we reacted the Mg0 complex I with dry air to obtain product mixtures. We attribute the highly selective oxidation of 1 to peroxide complex 5 to the stabilization of O22 in the inverse crown. A recent publication on the role of Ca2+ in photosystem II reports a heterometallic Ca/K peroxide complex and shows that alkali metal cations can be decisive for selectivity control42.

Reactions of 1 also selectively reduced S8, and depending on ratio, temperature and concentration, complexes of S2 (7) or S22 (8) could be obtained in near quantitative conversions. Interestingly, reaction of the disulfide complex (8) with 1 gave the monosulfide complex 7 in 52% yield. The crystal structures of 7 and 8 (Supplementary Fig. 64) strongly resemble those of their O analogues 2 and 5 (Fig. 3b,c). Efficient encapsulation of these larger S anions without major structural changes shows that the ring is able to stretch itself. Severe disorder, especially in 7, indicates that S2 fits less well in the ring than O2. In addition, reaction of the S2 complex (7) with 0.125 equiv. of S8 gave quantitatively the S22 complex (8).

Extension of the inverse crown

The efficient stabilization of the O2 anion in 2 by the surrounding metal cations prevented further reaction with a second equivalent of N2O to give the hyponitrite dianion N2O22, an onward reactivity that is often observed and generally difficult to control43. Although 2 does not react instantaneously with a second equivalent of N2O, overnight exposure to an excess of N2O led to the formation of several products among which we could identify (BDI*)MgNa4N′′3(N2O2) (6). Realizing that 6 is an extension of the inverse crown by one NaN′′ unit, the same reaction was performed in the presence of 0.33 equiv. trimeric (NaN′′)3. This led to formation of 6 as the major product, which after crystallization could be isolated in 52% yield. The crystal structure of 6 (Fig. 3d) shows the selective formation of cis-N2O22 tightly bound to Mg2+ and encapsulated in the crown by four additional contacts to Na+ cations. This demonstrates that the six-membered Mg–Na–N–Na–N–Na ring in the original inverse crown 1 can be extended by incorporation of additional NaN′′ units and adapt itself to larger encapsulated anions. Similar dynamic behaviour is typically observed in the self-assembly of inverse crown complexes10 (for example, Fig. 1a,b). The facile conversion of O2 in 2 to cis-N2O22 by reaction with N2O at room temperature stands in stark contrast with the harsh reaction conditions in the synthesis of [Na+]2[cis-N2O22] from Na2O and N2O that requires either heating to at least 360 °C (ref. 44) or high-energy ball-milling45.

Conclusion

One of the amide anions in trimeric (NaN′′)3 can be quantitatively substituted for the magnesyl anion (BDI*)Mg, giving cyclic (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1). As double N′′/(BDI*)Mg exchange is not observed, the formation of 1 is a highly selective reaction. Complex 1 is stable in alkanes to at least +60 °C, but decomposes in THF or in benzene. The redox-active inverse crown 1 efficiently reduces kinetically stable molecules, like N2O, but also epoxides, O2 or S8, by combining the strongly reducing power of a Mg0 centre with the stabilizing effect of a ring of Mg2+ and Na+ cations for anion complexation. This ring of cations is also responsible for the high selectivity of the reduction process. As it is shown that the ring size can adapt itself to the dimensions of the anion, it is anticipated that such bifunctional inverse crowns can be applied in the reduction of larger entities or the stabilization of unusual anions. Current work focuses on increasing the number of Mg0 centres in the ring to achieve multiple-electron transfer and mapping out the boundaries for these strongly reducing host–guest ring systems.

Methods

General considerations

All experiments were conducted in dry glassware under an inert nitrogen atmosphere by applying standard Schlenk techniques or glove boxes (MBraun) using freshly dried and degassed solvents. All solvents were degassed with nitrogen, dried over activated aluminium oxide (Innovative Technology, Pure Solv 400-4-MD, Solvent Purification System) and then stored under an inert atmosphere over molecular sieves (3 Å) unless noted otherwise. C6D6 (Sigma-Aldrich), cyclohexane-d12 (Deutero), methylcyclohexane-d14 (Deutero), propylene oxide (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), styrene oxide (97%, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1,2-epoxyhexane (97%, Sigma-Aldrich) were purchased as indicated, degassed and dried over molecular sieves (3 Å). NaN′′ (95%, Sigma-Aldrich) was washed with hexanes and dried under vacuum. N2O (N25, Messer), trans-stilbene oxide (99%, Acros Organics), cis-stilbene oxide (97%, Sigma-Aldrich) and S8 (flakes, ≥99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich) were not further purified.

NMR spectra were measured on Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz and Bruker Avance III HD 600 MHz spectrometers. Chemical shifts (δ) are denoted in parts per million (ppm) and coupling constants, in hertz (Hz). For describing signal multiplicities, common abbreviations are used: s (singlet), t (triplet) and m (multiplet). Spectra were referenced to the solvent residual signal (SiMe4 = 0 ppm). Assignments of NMR signals in the 1H and 13C{1H}/13C-APT NMR spectra (APT, Attached Proton Test) are based on two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy (Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence, Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation, Correlated Spectroscopy).

Elemental analysis was performed with a Hekatech Eurovector EA3000 analyser. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry measurements were performed on a Thermo Scientific Trace 1310 gas chromatography system (carrier gas, helium) with detection by a Thermo Scientic ISQ LT single quadrupole mass spectrometer. A Phenomenex Zebron ZB-5 column of dimensions 0.25 mm × 30 m with a film thickness of 0.25 μm was used. The samples (1 μl) were injected with an Instant Connect split/splitless (SSL) module in S3 split mode (injector temperature, 280 °C; split ratio, 0.9; carrier gas flow, 1.2 ml min–1). Temperature programs were started at 40 °C (hold 1 min) followed by heating ramps, optimized for ideal separation, ending at 330 °C (hold 5 min). Conditions for mass spectrometry were as follows: ion source temperature, 280 °C; ionizing energy, 70 eV; and mass range, 20–500 (mass to charge ratio, m/z). The molecular identity was confirmed by comparison with entries in the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library (v.2.2, built 10 June 2014).

Starting materials

The following compounds were synthesized according to literature procedures: [(BDI*)MgNa]2 (I; ref. 19).

Synthetic procedures

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1)

[(BDI*)MgNa]2 (I) (100 mg, 75.6 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) and (NaN′′)3 (55.5 mg, 101 μmol, 1.33 equiv.) were suspended in cyclohexane (6 ml), and a colour change from dark brown to dark red was observed upon stirring for 10 min at room temperature. Unreacted solids were filtered off and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness. The obtained reddish oil was stripped with pentane (three times, 6 ml) to quantitatively obtain essentially pure 1 in the form of an orange-red powder. Isolation of the product gave 153 mg of 1 (149 μmol, 99%). Dark-red crystals, suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction, were obtained by storing a concentrated solution of 1 in methylcyclohexane at –30 °C. The 1H NMR spectra of the raw product and the crystallized product are essentially the same.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.11–7.10 (m, 4H, meta-CHarom), 6.98–6.95 (m, 2H, para-CHarom), 5.25 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 2.94–2.88 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 2.05–1.97, 1.92–1.84 (two signals; m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.74–1.63 (m, 8H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.23 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 0.97 (t, 3JHH = 7.2 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 0.93 (t, 3JHH = 7.4 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), −0.12 (s, 36H, SiMe3), all in parts per million (ppm).

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 173.7 (2C, CN-backbone), 152.7 (2C, N–Carom), 140.2 (4C, orthoCarom), 126.0 (4C, metaCarom), 121.5 (2C, paraCarom), 96.3 (1C, CH-backbone), 44.4 (2C, CMe3tBu), 41.5 (4C, C(H)Et2), 33.4 (6C, CH3tBu), 27.7, 24.7 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 12.1, 11.4 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 7.2 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C55H105MgN4Na3Si4 (M = 1,028.09 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 64.26; H, 10.29; N, 5.45%; found C, 64.27; H, 10.20; N, 5.44%.

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2)

A solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) (29.5 mg, 28.7 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in methylcyclohexane-d14 (600 μl) was degassed (two times, freeze–pump–thaw) and the vacuum was backfilled with N2O at −80 °C. Upon stirring, the dark-red solution changed its colour to yellow, indicating full consumption of 1. All volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the waxy residue was stripped with pentanes (two times, 3 ml) and washed with hexanes (1 ml), quantitatively yielding essentially pure 2 as an off-white powder. Isolation of the product gave 26.4 mg of 2 (25.3 μmol, 88%). Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by storing a saturated solution of 2 in methylcyclohexane at −30 °C.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.21–7.16 (m, 6H, CHarom), 5.40 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 2.87–2.82 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 1.98–1.90, 1.89–1.82 (two signals; m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.75–1.65 (m, 8H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.23 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 1.09 (t, 3JHH = 7.3 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 0.97 (t, 3JHH = 7.4 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), –0.18 (s, 36H, SiMe3), all in ppm.

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 177.2 (2C, CN-backbone), 149.2 (2C, N–Carom), 140.6 (4C, orthoCarom), 126.4 (4C, metaCarom), 124.2 (2C, paraCarom), 96.4 (1C, CH-backbone), 44.9 (2C, CMe3tBu), 41.8 (4C, C(H)Et2), 33.0 (6C, CH3tBu), 29.9, 25.3 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 12.5, 12.1 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 6.9 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C55H105MgN4Na3OSi4 (M = 1,044.09 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 63.27; H, 10.14; N, 5.37%; found C, 63.45; H, 9.90; N, 4.96%.

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (O2) (5)

A solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) (30.0 mg, 29.2 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in methylcyclohexane (2 ml) was degassed (two times, freeze–pump–thaw) and the vacuum was backfilled with dry air at −80 °C. Upon stirring, the dark-red solution changed its colour to yellow, indicating full consumption of 1. All volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was washed with pentanes (1 ml), quantitatively yielding essentially pure 5 as an off-white powder. Isolation of the product gave 24.7 mg of 5 (23.3 μmol, 80%). Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by storing a saturated solution of 5 in hexanes at −30 °C.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (methylcyclohexane-d14, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.22–7.17 (m, 6H, CHarom), 5.35 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 2.91–2.86 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 1.95–1.88 (m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.75–1.67 (m, 8H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.61–1.57 (m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.26 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 0.98 (t, 3JHH = 7.3 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 0.94 (t, 3JHH = 7.4 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), −0.16 (s, 36H, SiMe3), all in ppm.

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (methylcyclohexane-d14, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 176.9 (2C, CN-backbone), 147.9 (2C, N–Carom), 140.7 (4C, orthoCarom), 126.3 (4C, meta-Carom), 123.7 (2C, paraCarom), 95.9 (1C, CH-backbone), 44.5 (2C, CMe3tBu), 41.2 (4C, C(H)Et2), 32.7 (6C, CH3tBu), 28.2, 24.6 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 12.0, 11.1 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 6.5 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C55H105MgN4Na3O2Si4 (M = 1,060.09 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 62.32; H, 9.98; N, 5.29%; found C, 62.19; H, 10.03; N, 5.60%.

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2(N2O2) (6)

A solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2O (2) (31.1 mg, 29.8 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) and (NaN′′)3 (5.50 mg, 10.0 μmol, 0.33 equiv.) in C6D6 (3 ml) was degassed (two times, freeze–pump–thaw) and the vacuum was backfilled with N2O at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at room temperature, and all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The obtained off-white powder was recrystallized from hexanes at −30 °C, yielding colourless crystals of 6 (19.7 mg, 15.5 μmol, 52%), which were suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.23–7.21 (m, 2H, para-CHarom), 7.17–7.16 (m, 4H, meta-CHarom), 5.67 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 2.90–2.85 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 1.99–1.91, 1.73–1.66, 1.59–1.53, 1.36–1.30 (four signals; m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.15 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 1.00–0.95 (m, 24H, CH(CH2CH3)2), −0.07 (s, 36H, SiMe3), −0.09 (s, 18H, SiMe3), all in ppm.

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 179.0 (2C, CN-backbone), 152.0 (2C, N–Carom), 142.2 (4C, orthoCarom), 125.3 (4C, meta-Carom), 123.2 (2C, paraCarom), 98.4 (1C, CH-backbone), 45.2 (2C, CMe3tBu), 42.3 (4C, C(H)Et2), 33.7 (6C, CH3tBu), 28.4, 25.2 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 12.8, 12.0 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 7.0 (6C, SiMe3), 6.9 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C61H123MgN7Na4O2Si6 (M = 1,271.48 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 57.62; H, 9.75; N, 7.71%; found C, 58.17; H, 9.58; N, 7.59%.

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S (7)

To a cooled (–30 °C) solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1) (31.1 mg, 30.2 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in methylcyclohexane (25 ml), S8 (1.0 mg, 3.90 μmol, 0.129 equiv.) was added. Upon vigorous stirring, the dark-red solution changed its colour to yellow, indicating full consumption of 1. The reaction mixture was filtered immediately and the filtrate was dried in vacuo. The waxy residue was stripped with pentanes (2 × 1 ml), quantitatively yielding essentially pure (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S (7) as an off-white powder. Isolation of the product gave 30.5 mg of 7 (28.8 μmol, 95%). Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by storing a saturated solution of 7 in hexanes at −30 °C. Both cooling and high dilution are crucial for quantitative formation of 7. When the concentration was increased and the reaction was run at room temperature, conversion was unselective, and also (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S2 (8) formed.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.13–7.05 (m, 6H, CHarom), 5.33 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 2.90–2.86 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 1.95–1.84, 1.75–1.65 (two signals; m, 8H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.23 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 0.98–0.94 (m, 24H, CH(CH2CH3)2), −0.16 (s, 36H, SiMe3), all in ppm.

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 177.2 (2C, CN-backbone), 149.5 (2C, N–Carom), 141.3 (4C, orthoCarom), 125.9 (4C, metaCarom), 121.9 (2C, paraCarom), 96.2 (1C, CH-backbone), 44.8 (2C, CMe3tBu), 41.6 (4C, C(H)Et2), 33.1 (6C, CH3tBu), 27.6, 24.8 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 11.6, 11.3 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 6.8 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C55H105MgN4Na3SSi4 (M = 1,060.15 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 62.31; H, 9.98; N, 5.28%; found C, 62.23; H, 10.38; N, 5.11%.

Synthesis of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S2 (8)

For procedure A, to a solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2 (1; 31.1 mg, 30.2 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in cyclohexane-d12 (600 μl), S8 (2.0 mg, 7.80 μmol, 0.26 equiv.) was added. Upon stirring, the dark-red solution changed its colour to yellow, indicating full consumption of 1. The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h and filtered, and the filtrate was dried in vacuo. The waxy residue was stripped with pentanes (2 × 1 ml) and washed with cold (−30 °C) pentanes (500 μl), yielding essentially pure (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S2 (8; 32.0 mg, 29.3 μmol, 90%) as an off-white powder. Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained by storing a saturated solution of 2 in hexanes at −30 °C.

For procedure B, to a solution of (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S (7; 30.5 mg, 28.8 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in cyclohexane-d12 (600 μl), S8 (1.0 mg, 3.90 μmol, 0.135 equiv.) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h and filtered, and the filtrate was dried in vacuo. Work-up according to the same procedure as in A yielded essentially pure (BDI*)MgNa3N′′2S2 (8; 29.9 mg, 27.4 μmol, 95%) as an off-white powder.

The 1H NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 600 MHz, 298 K): δ = 7.14–7.08 (m, 6H, CHarom), 5.29 (s, 1H, CHbackbone), 3.05–3.02 (m, 4H, C(H)Et2), 1.94–1.80 (m, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.71–1.65 (m, 4H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 1.27 (s, 18H, CH3tBu), 0.91 (t, 3JHH = 7.4 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), 0.86 (t, 3JHH = 7.3 Hz, 12H, CH(CH2CH3)2), –0.11 (s, 36H, SiMe3), all in ppm.

The 13C{1H} NMR results are as follows (cyclohexane-d12, 151 MHz, 298 K): δ = 177.5 (2C, CN-backbone), 148.7 (2C, N–Carom), 142.0 (4C, orthoCarom), 126.6 (4C, metaCarom), 122.1 (2C, paraCarom), 96.3 (1C, CH-backbone), 44.9 (2C, CMe3tBu), 41.4 (4C, C(H)Et2), 32.2 (6C, CH3tBu), 26.7, 24.2 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 10.9, 10.5 (two signals; 4C, CH(CH2CH3)2), 6.9 (12C, SiMe3), all in ppm.

Elemental analysis for C55H105MgN4Na3S2Si4 (M = 1,092.21 g mol–1) was as follows: calculated C, 60.48; H, 9.69; N, 5.13%; found C, 60.79; H, 10.00; N, 5.11%.

Crystal structure determination

Suitable single crystals of compounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, (BDI*)Na(THF) and (BDI*)Na(THF)3 were embedded in protective perfluoropolyalkyether oil (viscosity, 1,800 cSt; ABCR) on a microscope slide, and a single specimen was selected and subsequently transferred to the cold nitrogen gas stream of the diffractometer.

The intensity data were collected at 100 K using Cu Kα radiation (wavelength λ = 1.54184 Å) on an Agilent SuperNova dual radiation diffractometer with microfocus X-ray sources and mirror optics. The measured data were processed with the CrysAlisPro software package from Rigaku Oxford Diffraction using different version for compounds 4 (ref. 46), compounds 1 and 2 (ref. 47), compounds 58 (ref. 48) and (BDI*)Na(THF)49. Data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, and an empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics as well as a numerical absorption correction based on Gaussian integration over a multifaceted crystal model were applied. Using Olex2 (ref. 50), the structures were solved by dual-space methods (SHELXT)51 and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 using SHELXL (ref. 52). All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Most H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and refined by using a riding model where each H atom was assigned a fixed isotropic displacement parameter with a value equal to 1.2Ueq (CH or CH2) or 1.5Ueq (CH3) of its parent C atom.

Computational details

All calculations were carried out using Gaussian 16A (ref. 53). All methods were used as implemented. All structures were fully optimized at a B3PW91-GD3BJ/def2svp level of theory, which includes Grimme D3 dispersion correction using Becke–Johnson dampening (GD3BJ)54,55,56,57,58. All structures were characterized as true minima (Nimag = 0) or as transition states (Nimag = 1) by frequency calculations on the same level of theory. Energies were determined at a B3PW91-GD3BJ/def2tzvp level of theory. The same level of theory was used for NPA charge calculations with NBO6 (ref. 59). QTAIM analysis was carried out using AIMAll (v.17) with the wave functions obtained from the B3PW91-GD3BJ/def2tzvp level of theory60,61.

Related Articles

Free mobility across group boundaries promotes intergroup cooperation

Group cooperation is a cornerstone of human society, enabling achievements that surpass individual capabilities. However, groups also define and restrict who benefits from cooperative actions and who does not, raising the question of how to foster cooperation across group boundaries. This study investigates the impact of voluntary mobility across group boundaries on intergroup cooperation. Participants, organized into two groups, decided whether to create benefits for themselves, group members, or everyone. In each round, they were paired with another participant and could reward the other’s actions during an ‘enforcement stage’, allowing for indirect reciprocity. In line with our preregistered hypothesis, when participants interacted only with in-group members, indirect reciprocity enforced group cooperation, while intergroup cooperation declined. Conversely, higher intergroup cooperation emerged when participants were forced to interact solely with out-group members. Crucially, in the free-mobility treatment – where participants could choose whether to meet an in-group or an out-group member in the enforcement stage – intergroup cooperation was significantly higher than when participants were forced to interact only with in-group members, even though most participants endogenously chose to interact with in-group members. A few ‘mobile individuals’ were sufficient to enforce intergroup cooperation by selectively choosing out-group members, enabling indirect reciprocity to transcend group boundaries. These findings highlight the importance of free intergroup mobility for overcoming the limitations of group cooperation.

Flash Joule heating for synthesis, upcycling and remediation

Electric heating methods are being developed and used to electrify industrial applications and lower their carbon emissions. Direct Joule resistive heating is an energy-efficient electric heating technique that has been widely tested at the bench scale and could replace some energy-intensive and carbon-intensive processes. In this Review, we discuss the use of flash Joule heating (FJH) in processes that are traditionally energy-intensive or carbon-intensive. FJH uses pulse current discharge to rapidly heat materials directly to a desired temperature; it has high-temperature capabilities (>3,000 °C), fast heating and cooling rates (>102 °C s−1), short duration (milliseconds to seconds) and high energy efficiency (~100%). Carbon materials and metastable inorganic materials can be synthesized using FJH from virgin materials and waste feedstocks. FJH is also applied in resource recovery (such as from e-waste) and waste upcycling. An emerging application is in environmental remediation, where FJH can be used to rapidly degrade perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and to remove or immobilize heavy metals in soil and solid wastes. Life-cycle and technoeconomic analyses suggest that FJH can reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions and be cost-efficient compared with existing methods. Bringing FJH to industrially relevant scales requires further equipment and engineering development.

A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation

How do group size changes influence cooperation within groups? To examine this question, we performed a dynamic, network-based prisoner’s dilemma experiment with fMRI. Across 83 human participants, we observed increased cooperation as group size increased. However, our computational modeling analysis of behavior and fMRI revealed that groups size itself did not increase cooperation. Rather, interaction between (1) participants’ stable prosocial tendencies, and (2) dynamic reciprocal strategy weighed by memory confidence, underlies the group size-modulated increase in cooperation because the balance between them shifts towards the prosocial tendency with higher memory demands in larger groups. We found that memory confidence was encoded in fusiform gyrus and precuneus, whereas its integration with prosocial tendencies was reflected in the left DLPFC and dACC. Therefore, interaction between recall uncertainty during reciprocal interaction (i.e., forgetting) and one’s individual prosocial preference is a core pillar of emergent cooperation in more naturalistic and dynamic group formation.

Modeling the impact of structure and coverage on the reactivity of realistic heterogeneous catalysts

Adsorbates often cover the surfaces of catalysts densely as they carry out reactions, dynamically altering their structure and reactivity. Understanding adsorbate-induced phenomena and harnessing them in our broader quest for improved catalysts is a substantial challenge that is only beginning to be addressed. Here we chart a path toward a deeper understanding of such phenomena by focusing on emerging in silico modeling methodologies, which will increasingly incorporate machine learning techniques. We first examine how adsorption on catalyst surfaces can lead to local and even global structural changes spanning entire nanoparticles, and how this affects their reactivity. We then evaluate current efforts and the remaining challenges in developing robust and predictive simulations for modeling such behavior. Last, we provide our perspectives in four critical areas—integration of artificial intelligence, building robust catalysis informatics infrastructure, synergism with experimental characterization, and adaptive modeling frameworks—that we believe can help surmount the remaining challenges in rationally designing catalysts in light of these complex phenomena.

Resolving the fundamentals of the J-integral concept by multi-method in situ nanoscale stress-strain mapping

The integrity of structural materials is oftentimes defined by their resistance against catastrophic failure through dissipative plastic processes at the crack tip, commonly quantified by the J-integral concept. However, to date the experimental stress and strain fields necessary to quantify the J-integral associated with local crack propagation in its original integral form were inaccessible. Here, we present a multi-method nanoscale strain- and stress-mapping surrounding a growing crack tip in two identical miniaturized fracture specimens made from a nanocrystalline FeCrMnNiCo high-entropy alloy. The respective samples were tested in situ in a scanning electron microscope and a synchrotron X-ray nanodiffraction setup, with detailed analyzes of loading states during elastic loading, crack tip blunting and general yielding, corroborated by a detailed elastic-plastic finite element model. This complementary in situ methodology uniquely enabled a detailed quantification of the J-integral along different integration paths from experimental nanoscale stress and strain fields. We find that conventional linear-elastic and elastic-plastic models, typically used to interpret fracture phenomena, have limited applicability at micron to nanoscale distances from propagating cracks. This for the first time unravels a limit to the path-independence of the J-integral, which has significant implications in the development and assessment of modern damage-tolerant materials and microstructures.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *