A collaborative force for precision medicine progress: the STRIPE pharmacogenomics conference series

A collaborative force for precision medicine progress: the STRIPE pharmacogenomics conference series

The landscape of precision medicine

The field of precision medicine offers a more personalized approach to healthcare, recognizing the unique combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors that influence each person’s health. This approach aims to tailor treatments to individual needs, potentially making healthcare more effective and reducing unwanted side effects.

Pharmacogenomics, a key part of precision medicine, explores how a person’s genetic makeup affects their response to drugs. This knowledge can lead to optimized therapeutic regimens, ensuring that patients receive medications that are more likely to work well for them while minimizing the risk of adverse reactions.

Implementing pharmacogenomics into everyday medical practice involves several steps and the collaboration of many different parties. The journey from discovering genetic markers that influence drug responses to applying this information in clinical settings is complex. It involves not just the scientists and doctors but also patients who undergo genetic testing and the broader healthcare system that supports this technology.

Despite its potential, the path to integrating pharmacogenomics into healthcare comes with challenges. It requires a collective effort from a wide range of stakeholders, including medical professionals who need to understand and apply genetic information, patients who are central to the testing and treatment processes, and the healthcare infrastructure needed to support these activities. Regulatory oversight also plays a role in ensuring the reliability and safety of pharmacogenomic testing.

The promise of precision medicine, particularly through pharmacogenomics, is to make treatment more personalized and effective. However, reaching this goal involves navigating complexities like standardizing testing practices, making genetic testing accessible to a diverse range of people, and incorporating genetic data into everyday medical decisions. As the field grows, continued collaboration, innovation, and education will be crucial for harnessing the full potential of precision medicine to enhance patient care.

STRIPE: A collaborative force for progress

STRIPE facilitates the consensus of different perspectives and expertise. Precision medicine is inherently multidisciplinary, requiring input from geneticists, clinicians, bioinformaticians, and others. By bringing these diverse voices to the table, STRIPE supports comprehensive and effective practices in pharmacogenomics.

The pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing cycle involves multiple stakeholders (Fig. 1), each playing an important role in ensuring the effective integration and utilization of PGx testing in clinical practice. Physicians and healthcare providers are at the forefront, responsible for identifying patients who may benefit from PGx testing and interpreting the test results to guide personalized treatment plans. Pharmacists collaborate closely with physicians to provide medication management and patient counseling based on PGx data. Laboratory professionals and clinical geneticists conduct and analyze the PGx tests, ensuring accuracy and reliability of the results. Health plans and insurers determine coverage and reimbursement policies, which significantly influence patient access to PGx testing. Patients are central to the cycle, as they provide the genetic material for testing and ultimately benefit from tailored therapeutic strategies. Pharmacogenomics researchers catalyze and lead research in precision medicine for the discovery and translation of genomic variation influencing therapeutic and adverse drug effects [3]. In addition, regulatory bodies and policymakers establish guidelines and standards to ensure the quality, safety, and ethical use of PGx testing. Each stakeholder’s role is integral to advancing the implementation of precision medicine and optimizing patient outcomes through PGx testing. Stakeholders must work together to develop and implement practices that can adapt to the rapid pace of scientific discovery while maintaining rigorous standards of evidence. By aligning on these standards, the industry can enhance the impact of pharmacogenomics on patient care, making personalized medicine a practical reality for more individuals.

Fig. 1: Stakeholders Involved in the Lifecycle of a Pharmacogenomics Test.
A collaborative force for precision medicine progress: the STRIPE pharmacogenomics conference series

The figure outlines the testing process, including the reuse of previous test results to inform future prescribing decisions. The top section shows stakeholders involved in various stages of the test lifecycle. Every patient test is informed by the contributions of each stakeholder group. CDST Clinical Decision Support Tool, HCP Healthcare Provider, PGx Pharmacogenomics, ACLA American Clinical Laboratory Association, CPIC Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, CLIA Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, FDA Food & Drug Administration.

Full size image

The road ahead

As we delve into the conference proceedings, we are met with a compelling narrative of progress and collaboration. The STRIPE community’s dedication to tackling the complex challenges of precision medicine and promoting standardized practices is a testament to the potential that lies within collaborative communities.

In closing, we must recognize that precision medicine is a collective endeavor. It is not the work of a single institution but a global effort that requires the collaboration and consensus of diverse stakeholders. The Partners in Precision Medicine conference proceedings serve as a reminder of the power of collaboration and the importance of standardization in the journey toward realizing the full potential of precision medicine [4]. Together, we can unlock new horizons in patient care and continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in the realm of healthcare.

Related Articles

Advance in peptide-based drug development: delivery platforms, therapeutics and vaccines

The successful approval of peptide-based drugs can be attributed to a collaborative effort across multiple disciplines. The integration of novel drug design and synthesis techniques, display library technology, delivery systems, bioengineering advancements, and artificial intelligence have significantly expedited the development of groundbreaking peptide-based drugs, effectively addressing the obstacles associated with their character, such as the rapid clearance and degradation, necessitating subcutaneous injection leading to increasing patient discomfort, and ultimately advancing translational research efforts. Peptides are presently employed in the management and diagnosis of a diverse array of medical conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, weight loss, oncology, and rare diseases, and are additionally garnering interest in facilitating targeted drug delivery platforms and the advancement of peptide-based vaccines. This paper provides an overview of the present market and clinical trial progress of peptide-based therapeutics, delivery platforms, and vaccines. It examines the key areas of research in peptide-based drug development through a literature analysis and emphasizes the structural modification principles of peptide-based drugs, as well as the recent advancements in screening, design, and delivery technologies. The accelerated advancement in the development of novel peptide-based therapeutics, including peptide-drug complexes, new peptide-based vaccines, and innovative peptide-based diagnostic reagents, has the potential to promote the era of precise customization of disease therapeutic schedule.

Energy metabolism in health and diseases

Energy metabolism is indispensable for sustaining physiological functions in living organisms and assumes a pivotal role across physiological and pathological conditions. This review provides an extensive overview of advancements in energy metabolism research, elucidating critical pathways such as glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and amino acid metabolism, along with their intricate regulatory mechanisms. The homeostatic balance of these processes is crucial; however, in pathological states such as neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer, extensive metabolic reprogramming occurs, resulting in impaired glucose metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction, which accelerate disease progression. Recent investigations into key regulatory pathways, including mechanistic target of rapamycin, sirtuins, and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, have considerably deepened our understanding of metabolic dysregulation and opened new avenues for therapeutic innovation. Emerging technologies, such as fluorescent probes, nano-biomaterials, and metabolomic analyses, promise substantial improvements in diagnostic precision. This review critically examines recent advancements and ongoing challenges in metabolism research, emphasizing its potential for precision diagnostics and personalized therapeutic interventions. Future studies should prioritize unraveling the regulatory mechanisms of energy metabolism and the dynamics of intercellular energy interactions. Integrating cutting-edge gene-editing technologies and multi-omics approaches, the development of multi-target pharmaceuticals in synergy with existing therapies such as immunotherapy and dietary interventions could enhance therapeutic efficacy. Personalized metabolic analysis is indispensable for crafting tailored treatment protocols, ultimately providing more accurate medical solutions for patients. This review aims to deepen the understanding and improve the application of energy metabolism to drive innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Landscape of small nucleic acid therapeutics: moving from the bench to the clinic as next-generation medicines

The ability of small nucleic acids to modulate gene expression via a range of processes has been widely explored. Compared with conventional treatments, small nucleic acid therapeutics have the potential to achieve long-lasting or even curative effects via gene editing. As a result of recent technological advances, efficient small nucleic acid delivery for therapeutic and biomedical applications has been achieved, accelerating their clinical translation. Here, we review the increasing number of small nucleic acid therapeutic classes and the most common chemical modifications and delivery platforms. We also discuss the key advances in the design, development and therapeutic application of each delivery platform. Furthermore, this review presents comprehensive profiles of currently approved small nucleic acid drugs, including 11 antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), 2 aptamers and 6 siRNA drugs, summarizing their modifications, disease-specific mechanisms of action and delivery strategies. Other candidates whose clinical trial status has been recorded and updated are also discussed. We also consider strategic issues such as important safety considerations, novel vectors and hurdles for translating academic breakthroughs to the clinic. Small nucleic acid therapeutics have produced favorable results in clinical trials and have the potential to address previously “undruggable” targets, suggesting that they could be useful for guiding the development of additional clinical candidates.

Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets

Macrophages are immune cells belonging to the mononuclear phagocyte system. They play crucial roles in immune defense, surveillance, and homeostasis. This review systematically discusses the types of hematopoietic progenitors that give rise to macrophages, including primitive hematopoietic progenitors, erythro-myeloid progenitors, and hematopoietic stem cells. These progenitors have distinct genetic backgrounds and developmental processes. Accordingly, macrophages exhibit complex and diverse functions in the body, including phagocytosis and clearance of cellular debris, antigen presentation, and immune response, regulation of inflammation and cytokine production, tissue remodeling and repair, and multi-level regulatory signaling pathways/crosstalk involved in homeostasis and physiology. Besides, tumor-associated macrophages are a key component of the TME, exhibiting both anti-tumor and pro-tumor properties. Furthermore, the functional status of macrophages is closely linked to the development of various diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic conditions, and trauma. Targeting macrophages has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in these contexts. Clinical trials of macrophage-based targeted drugs, macrophage-based immunotherapies, and nanoparticle-based therapy were comprehensively summarized. Potential challenges and future directions in targeting macrophages have also been discussed. Overall, our review highlights the significance of this versatile immune cell in human health and disease, which is expected to inform future research and clinical practice.

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most people trust scientists and agree that scientists should engage more in society and policymaking. We found variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual- and country-level variables, including political orientation. While there is no widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *