Author Correction: Global loss of promoter–enhancer connectivity and rebalancing of gene expression during early colorectal cancer carcinogenesis
Related Articles
Enhancer reprogramming: critical roles in cancer and promising therapeutic strategies
Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer initiation and progression, driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations. Enhancer reprogramming has emerged as a pivotal driver of carcinogenesis, with cancer cells often relying on aberrant transcriptional programs. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has provided critical insights into enhancer reprogramming events and their role in malignancy. While targeting enhancers presents a promising therapeutic strategy, significant challenges remain. These include the off-target effects of enhancer-targeting technologies, the complexity and redundancy of enhancer networks, and the dynamic nature of enhancer reprogramming, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. This review comprehensively encapsulates the structural attributes of enhancers, delineates the mechanisms underlying their dysregulation in malignant transformation, and evaluates the therapeutic opportunities and limitations associated with targeting enhancers in cancer.
Modelling and design of transcriptional enhancers
Transcriptional enhancers are the genomic elements that contain critical information for the regulation of gene expression. This information is encoded through precisely arranged transcription factor-binding sites. Genomic sequence-to-function models, computational models that take DNA sequences as input and predict gene regulatory features, have become essential for unravelling the complex combinatorial rules that govern cell-type-specific activities of enhancers. These models function as biological ‘oracles’, capable of accurately predicting the activity of novel DNA sequences. By leveraging these oracles, DNA sequences can be optimized towards designed synthetic enhancers with tailored cell-type-specific or cell-state-specific activities. In parallel, generative artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing in genomics and enhancer design. Synthetic enhancers hold great promise for a wide range of biomedical applications, from facilitating fundamental research to enabling gene therapies.
Latent circuit inference from heterogeneous neural responses during cognitive tasks
Higher cortical areas carry a wide range of sensory, cognitive and motor signals mixed in heterogeneous responses of single neurons tuned to multiple task variables. Dimensionality reduction methods that rely on correlations between neural activity and task variables leave unknown how heterogeneous responses arise from connectivity to drive behavior. We develop the latent circuit model, a dimensionality reduction approach in which task variables interact via low-dimensional recurrent connectivity to produce behavioral output. We apply the latent circuit inference to recurrent neural networks trained to perform a context-dependent decision-making task and find a suppression mechanism in which contextual representations inhibit irrelevant sensory responses. We validate this mechanism by confirming the behavioral effects of patterned connectivity perturbations predicted by the latent circuit model. We find similar suppression of irrelevant sensory responses in the prefrontal cortex of monkeys performing the same task. We show that incorporating causal interactions among task variables is critical for identifying behaviorally relevant computations from neural response data.
Targeting of TAMs: can we be more clever than cancer cells?
With increasing incidence and geography, cancer is one of the leading causes of death, reduced quality of life and disability worldwide. Principal progress in the development of new anticancer therapies, in improving the efficiency of immunotherapeutic tools, and in the personification of conventional therapies needs to consider cancer-specific and patient-specific programming of innate immunity. Intratumoral TAMs and their precursors, resident macrophages and monocytes, are principal regulators of tumor progression and therapy resistance. Our review summarizes the accumulated evidence for the subpopulations of TAMs and their increasing number of biomarkers, indicating their predictive value for the clinical parameters of carcinogenesis and therapy resistance, with a focus on solid cancers of non-infectious etiology. We present the state-of-the-art knowledge about the tumor-supporting functions of TAMs at all stages of tumor progression and highlight biomarkers, recently identified by single-cell and spatial analytical methods, that discriminate between tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting TAMs, where both subtypes express a combination of prototype M1 and M2 genes. Our review focuses on novel mechanisms involved in the crosstalk among epigenetic, signaling, transcriptional and metabolic pathways in TAMs. Particular attention has been given to the recently identified link between cancer cell metabolism and the epigenetic programming of TAMs by histone lactylation, which can be responsible for the unlimited protumoral programming of TAMs. Finally, we explain how TAMs interfere with currently used anticancer therapeutics and summarize the most advanced data from clinical trials, which we divide into four categories: inhibition of TAM survival and differentiation, inhibition of monocyte/TAM recruitment into tumors, functional reprogramming of TAMs, and genetic enhancement of macrophages.
Simultaneous tACS-fMRI reveals state- and frequency-specific modulation of hippocampal-cortical functional connectivity
Non-invasive indirect hippocampal-targeted stimulation is of broad scientific and clinical interest. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is appealing because it allows oscillatory stimulation to study hippocampal theta (3–8 Hz) activity. We found that tACS administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging yielded a frequency-, mental state- and topologically-specific effect of theta stimulation (but not other frequencies) enhancing right (but not left) hippocampal-cortical connectivity during resting blocks but not during task blocks. Control analyses showed that this effect was not due to possible stimulation-induced changes in signal quality or head movement. Our findings are promising for targeted network modulations of deep brain structures for research and clinical intervention.
Responses