Difunctionalization of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes enabled by merging C−C cleavage and ruthenium-catalysed remote C−H activation

Difunctionalization of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes enabled by merging C−C cleavage and ruthenium-catalysed remote C−H activation

Main

In the quest of ‘escaping from flatland’1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, highly functionalized cyclobutanes with unique puckered linear geometry have received increasing attention in medicinal chemistry. The fraction of sp3-hybridized carbon atoms (Fsp3) was identified as a key descriptor of drug likeness, and the increased Fsp3 in cyclobutanes renders them as a privileged motif for isosteres in drug design9. The incorporation of cyclobutane scaffolds often enhances the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of drug molecules. In contrast to usually flat arene rings, polysubstituted cyclobutanes with high Fsp3 can provide, among others, improved solubility due to their nonplanar substituent vectors. Indeed, several pharmaceuticals featuring 1,3-bifunctional cyclobutanes have been clinically tested, such as PF-03654746 (ref. 10), NVP-ADW 742 (ref. 11), NK1 selective antagonists12 and Linsitinib13, translating into a strong need for innovative cyclobutane syntheses (Fig. 1a). However, in contrast to rather well-established bifunctionalization of bicyclo[1.1.0]pentanes (BCPs)14,15,16,17,18 and ring expansions of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes (BCBs)19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41 (Fig. 1b), strategies to access structurally complex cyclobutanes are, unfortunately, scarce. Thus far, these syntheses are limited to radical or nucleophilic additions to BCBs, typically resulting in mono- or disubstituted cyclobutanes42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, with only few examples for densely substituted cyclobutanes50,51,52,53,54. Furthermore, the aforementioned transformations are largely limited to rather harsh conditions and elements of prefunctionalization on the coupling partner, while the merger of C–C activations55,56,57,58,59,60 of BCBs with remote C–H activation61 has thus far proven elusive. To address these current topical needs, we have now developed the merger of BCBs C–C functionalization with remote C–H functionalization62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73 by a single, yet powerful, ruthenium(II) catalyst. Salient features of our findings include (1) versatile 1,3-difunctionalization of BCBs for tri- and tetrasubstituted Fsp3-rich cyclobutanes; (2) a single ruthenium complex for a multi-catalysis manifold including an efficient ruthenacycle-mediated halogen-atom transfer (Ru-XAT) process, C–C scission and meta-C–H functionalization; (3) exceedingly mild reaction conditions and (4) outstanding chemo- and site selectivities (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1: Design blueprint for the difunctionalization of BCBs to access 1,1,3-trisubstituted and 1,1,3,3-tetrasubstituted cyclobutanes enabled by remote C–H activation.
Difunctionalization of bicyclo[1.1.0]butanes enabled by merging C−C cleavage and ruthenium-catalysed remote C−H activation

a, Selected drug molecules containing 1,3-difunctionalized cyclobutane skeleton. b, Current strategies50,51,52,53,54 for the synthesis of highly functionalized cyclobutanes via strain release. c, Our hypothesis on the 1,3-difunctionalization of BCBs by remote C−H activation to access valuable 1,1,3-trisubstituted and 1,1,3,3-tetrasubstituted cyclobutanes via a Ru-XAT process. Ar, aryl.; Het, heteroarenes.

Full size image

Results and discussion

Optimization studies

We initiated our studies on BCBs 1,3-difunctionalization through remote C–H activation, with benzyl-bicyclo[1.1.0]butane-1-carboxylate (1a), 2-phenylpyridine (2a) and ethyl-2-bromo-2,2-difluoroacetate (3a) as the model substrates (Table 1). We were pleased to find that the desired product 4 was efficiently obtained in 75% isolated yield with Ru(O2CMes)2(p-cymene) as the catalyst and P(4-CF3C6H4)3 (Table 1, entry 1). Next, a series of phosphines, as well as alternative ligands such as bipyridine (bpy) and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC), were tested, and P(4-CF3C6H4)3 was found to be superior (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Ru(OAc)2(p-cymene) gave the desired product 4 with 52% yield, while [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 was ineffective (Table 1, entry 4), highlighting the importance of carboxylate assistance in the C–H ruthenation74. [Ru(tBuCN)5(H2O)](BF4)275 as a precatalyst gave inferior results (Table 1, entry 5). Control experiments revealed the crucial role of the ruthenium catalyst and the phosphine ligand for the BCBs C–C cleavage difunctionalization (Table 1, entry 6).

Table 1 Optimization of the reaction parameters
Full size table

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we subsequently evaluated the viable substrate scope for the bifunctionalization of BCBs 1 with differently substituted heteroarenes 2 (Fig. 2). Arenes with distinct electronic features and substituents, such as fluorine, thioether, bromine, ester and keto groups, were fully tolerated by the versatile catalyst (529). Transformable pyrazoles, ketimine and oxazolines could be employed to guarantee meta-selectivity (1724, 30). Drug-relevant motifs, such as diazepam, purines and nucleoside proved to be viable for the ruthenium-catalysed BCBs difunctionalization (2629).

Fig. 2: Scope of heteroarenes.
figure 2

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (3.0 equiv.), 3 (3.0 equiv.), [Ru(O2CMes)2(p-cymene)] (10 mol%), P(4-CF3C6H4)3 (10 mol%), Na2CO3 (2.0 equiv.), 1,4-dioxane (2.0 ml), 65 °C, 24–48 h. All yields are isolated yields. The ratios of the diastereomers (cis and trans) were determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy or isolated yield. aWork-up with 3 N HCl and stirring for a further 3 h. Note that the presented structures are the major isomers. Bn, benzyl; Mes, mesityl; Py, pyridyl; Pym, pyrimidinyl.

Full size image

A series of substituted BCB esters 1 furnished the 1,1,3-trisubstituted cyclobutanes 3137 (Fig. 3). Thus, BCBs featuring sensitive functional groups, including ester, thiophene, ketone, amide and sulfone (3841) were efficiently converted to desired products. Furthermore, disubstituted BCBs were identified as amenable substrates (4247). Here, disubstituted BCBs favoured to form a benzylic radical rather than a tertiary radical, chemo-selectively delivering diarylcyclobutane motifs. Likewise, a wide range of alkyl halides, such as perfluoroalkane halides, fluorine-free alkyl bromide, monofluoroalkyl bromide and difluoroalkyl amides were tolerated to give the desired cyclobutanes 4857.

Fig. 3: Scope of BCBs and radical precursors.
figure 3

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (3.0 equiv.), 3 (3.0 equiv.), [Ru(O2CMes)2(p-cymene)] (10 mol%), P(4-CF3C6H4)3 (10 mol%), Na2CO3 (2.0 equiv.), 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL), 65 °C, 24–48 h. All yields are isolated yields. The ratios of the diastereomers were determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy or isolated yields. Note that the presented structures are the major isomers. In the case of the 1,1,3-trisubstituted cyclobutanes, the cis structure is the major, while for the 1,1,3,3-tetrasubstituted cyclobutanes, the (1r,3r) structure is the major, which was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (see the X-ray structure of compound 62 in Supplementary Data 6 for details). Naph, 2-naphthyl group.

Full size image

Gram-scale and late-stage derivatization

To demonstrate the practical utility of our BCBs C–C scission/remote activation strategy, cyclobutane 4 was prepared at gram scale with comparable efficacy (Fig. 4a). The site selectivity ensured that pyrimidine, oxazoline and ketimine (vide infra) as well as pyridine and pyrazole were efficiently diversified, extending the viable portfolio (Fig. 4b). Further, a triple activation manifold proved viable in terms of ruthenium(II)-catalysed C−C/meta-C−H and ortho-photo-induced C−H activation (58 and 59).

Fig. 4: Gram-scale and late-stage derivatization.
figure 4

a, Gram-scale reaction gave the desired product 4 in high yield. b, Various downstream functionalization of products 4, 42 or 46. Cp*, 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl; DCE, 1,2-dichloroethane; LED, light emitting diode; MMA, methyl methacrylate; Piv, pivaloyl; PMP, p-methoxyphenyl; r.t., room temperature; THF, tetrahydrofuran.

Full size image

DFT calculation and mechanism studies

To gain insights into the reaction mechanism, the site selectivity of radical addition at the two possible BCB sites was probed by means of density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. 5a; see Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 7 and 8 for details). In the case of monosubstituted BCB 1a, the difluoroalkyl radical preferentially attacked at the unsubstituted carbon, leading to the formation of a more thermodynamically stable tertiary radical. The shorter bridge C−C distance (1.61 Å) and the longer C−CRF distance (2.21 Å) in TS3-s4, compared with TS4-s2, indicated that the radical attack at the unsubstituted site proceeded through an earlier transition state that structurally resembled the starting BCB 1a. In the case of radical addition to the disubstituted BCB 1m, the ester-substituted site is favoured, resulting in the formation of thermodynamically stable benzylic radical. During the cleavage of the σ-bridge bond in disubstituted BCB 1m, TS7-s1 exhibited an earlier transition state characteristic, evidenced by the slightly elongated C–C bridge distance of BCB 1a (1.63 Å in TS7-s1 and 1.64 Å in TS8-s1) and the relatively larger C–C distances between the BCB 1m and the difluoroalkyl radical (2.25 Å in TS7-s1 and 2.21 Å in TS8-s1). The presynthesized p-cymene-free ruthenacycle 66 yielded the desired product 4 in the presence of MesCO2H and phosphine ligand (Fig. 5b). The control experiment without a phosphine ligand as well as with alternative ligands, such as bpy or NHC, in the optimization table failed to provide the desired product, highlighting the essential role of the phosphine ligand assistance76,77,78,79. The key role of the phosphine ligand was further demonstrated by attempting this transformation with carboxylate-free ruthenium(II) phosphine complex 67, yielding the desired product in high yield when MesCO2H was added (Fig. 5c). The carboxylate-free ruthenium(II) phosphine complex 67 could afford the desired product only in 14% yield even in the absence of MesCO₂H (Fig. 5c). Additionally, radical trapping experiments validated the radical mechanism (see Supplementary Data 7.1.1 for details). On the basis of our mechanism and computational findings, a plausible catalytic cycle is put forwards in Fig. 5d, featuring ruthenacycle A in a ruthenacycle-mediated XAT process to furnish ruthenium(III) intermediate B with an energy barrier of 14.9 kcal mol−1. The thus formed alkyl radical 3R attacks the BCB 1a at the unsubstituted site to induce strain-release C–C scission with an energy barrier of 15.9 kcal mol−1, forming the tertiary radical C. Species C reacts at the ruthena(III)cycle B para to the CAr–Ru bond, delivering the stabilized singlet metallacycle D. Here, the formation of the cis product is favoured over the trans product by 1.4 kcal mol−1. The subsequent rearomatization and proto-demetallation releases the desired cyclobutane 4, thereby regenerating the catalytically active ruthenium(II) species F.

Fig. 5: DFT calculation and mechanism studies.
figure 5

a, Computed relative Gibbs free energies (ΔG338.15) in kcal mol−1 for radical attack at the monosubstituted BCB 1a and disubstituted BCB 1m were conducted at the B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-TZVP-SMD(1,4-dioxane)//PBE0-D3BJ/def2-SVP level of theory. b, p-Cymene-free ruthenacycle complex 66 as the catalyst. c, Carboxylate-free ruthenium(II) phosphine complex 67 as the catalyst. d, Proposed catalytic cycle associated with relative Gibbs free energies (ΔG338.15) in kcal mol−1 based on our mechanism studies and DFT calculation. RF, difluoroalkyl; P, P(4-CF3C6H4)3; L, 1,4-dioxane, 2a and so on.

Full size image

Conclusions

We have achieved the merger of BCBs C–C activation with remote meta-C–H functionalization by a multipotent ruthenium catalyst. The double activation proceeded in a highly chemo- and position-selective fashion and provided access to densely decorated Fsp3-rich cyclobutanes in a single step. Mechanistic studies were suggestive of a Ru-XAT process enabling chemo-selective BCBs opening and meta-diversification.

Methods

General methods for 1,3-difunctionalization of BCBs enabled by ruthenium-catalysed remote C–H activation

The general procedure for 1,3-difunctionalization of BCBs was as follows: [Ru(O2CMes)2(p-cymene)] (16.8 mg, 10.0 mol%), P(4-CF3C6H4)3 (14.0 mg, 10.0 mol%), Na2CO3 (64 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), 1,4-dioxane (2.0 ml), 1 (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), 2 (0.9 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) and 3 (0.9 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) were added into an oven-dried 20 ml pressure tube. The reaction mixture was stirred at 65 °C for 24–48 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding cyclobutanes 457.

Related Articles

First-principles and machine-learning approaches for interpreting and predicting the properties of MXenes

MXenes are a versatile family of 2D inorganic materials with applications in energy storage, shielding, sensing, and catalysis. This review highlights computational studies using density functional theory and machine-learning approaches to explore their structure (stacking, functionalization, doping), properties (electronic, mechanical, magnetic), and application potential. Key advances and challenges are critically examined, offering insights into applying computational research to transition these materials from the lab to practical use.

Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration

The reconstruction of craniomaxillofacial bone defects remains clinically challenging. To date, autogenous grafts are considered the gold standard but present critical drawbacks. These shortcomings have driven recent research on craniomaxillofacial bone reconstruction to focus on synthetic grafts with distinct materials and fabrication techniques. Among the various fabrication methods, additive manufacturing (AM) has shown significant clinical potential. AM technologies build three-dimensional (3D) objects with personalized geometry customizable from a computer-aided design. These layer-by-layer 3D biomaterial structures can support bone formation by guiding cell migration/proliferation, osteogenesis, and angiogenesis. Additionally, these structures can be engineered to degrade concomitantly with the new bone tissue formation, making them ideal as synthetic grafts. This review delves into the key advances of bioceramic grafts/scaffolds obtained by 3D printing for personalized craniomaxillofacial bone reconstruction. In this regard, clinically relevant topics such as ceramic-based biomaterials, graft/scaffold characteristics (macro/micro-features), material extrusion-based 3D printing, and the step-by-step workflow to engineer personalized bioceramic grafts are discussed. Importantly, in vitro models are highlighted in conjunction with a thorough examination of the signaling pathways reported when investigating these bioceramics and their effect on cellular response/behavior. Lastly, we summarize the clinical potential and translation opportunities of personalized bioceramics for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.

Solution-processable 2D materials for monolithic 3D memory-sensing-computing platforms: opportunities and challenges

Solution-processable 2D materials (2DMs) are gaining attention for applications in logic, memory, and sensing devices. This review surveys recent advancements in memristors, transistors, and sensors using 2DMs, focusing on their charge transport mechanisms and integration into silicon CMOS platforms. We highlight key challenges posed by the material’s nanosheet morphology and defect dynamics and discuss future potential for monolithic 3D integration with CMOS technology.

Two types of motifs enhance human recall and generalization of long sequences

Whether it is listening to a piece of music, learning a new language, or solving a mathematical equation, people often acquire abstract notions in the sense of motifs and variables—manifested in musical themes, grammatical categories, or mathematical symbols. How do we create abstract representations of sequences? Are these abstract representations useful for memory recall? In addition to learning transition probabilities, chunking, and tracking ordinal positions, we propose that humans also use abstractions to arrive at efficient representations of sequences. We propose and study two abstraction categories: projectional motifs and variable motifs. Projectional motifs find a common theme underlying distinct sequence instances. Variable motifs contain symbols representing sequence entities that can change. In two sequence recall experiments, we train participants to remember sequences with projectional and variable motifs, respectively, and examine whether motif training benefits the recall of novel sequences sharing the same motif. Our result suggests that training projectional and variables motifs improve transfer recall accuracy, relative to control groups. We show that a model that chunks sequences in an abstract motif space may learn and transfer more efficiently, compared to models that learn chunks or associations on a superficial level. Our study suggests that humans construct efficient sequential memory representations according to the two types of abstraction we propose, and creating these abstractions benefits learning and out-of-distribution generalization. Our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of human abstraction learning and generalization.

Flash Joule heating for synthesis, upcycling and remediation

Electric heating methods are being developed and used to electrify industrial applications and lower their carbon emissions. Direct Joule resistive heating is an energy-efficient electric heating technique that has been widely tested at the bench scale and could replace some energy-intensive and carbon-intensive processes. In this Review, we discuss the use of flash Joule heating (FJH) in processes that are traditionally energy-intensive or carbon-intensive. FJH uses pulse current discharge to rapidly heat materials directly to a desired temperature; it has high-temperature capabilities (>3,000 °C), fast heating and cooling rates (>102 °C s−1), short duration (milliseconds to seconds) and high energy efficiency (~100%). Carbon materials and metastable inorganic materials can be synthesized using FJH from virgin materials and waste feedstocks. FJH is also applied in resource recovery (such as from e-waste) and waste upcycling. An emerging application is in environmental remediation, where FJH can be used to rapidly degrade perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and to remove or immobilize heavy metals in soil and solid wastes. Life-cycle and technoeconomic analyses suggest that FJH can reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions and be cost-efficient compared with existing methods. Bringing FJH to industrially relevant scales requires further equipment and engineering development.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *