Faster deployment of renewables stabilizes electricity prices in Europe

The policy problem

The volatility of energy prices is a major driver of economic fluctuations and their large associated costs. European electricity markets are based on day-ahead contracting where the price is set by the higher marginal cost of the last activated plants. In this design, fluctuations in the prices of fuels, particularly of natural gas, have large impacts on the price of electricity and make it highly volatile. Investments in solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind technologies, which do not depend on fossil fuels, could reduce the sensitivity of electricity prices to fuel prices. However, since their operation is affected by solar irradiance and wind speed, the volatility caused by weather factors would increase. Additional penetration of these technologies is widely expected given their decreased costs and it is required to achieve the European Union (EU) decarbonization goals. Understanding whether this will increase the volatility of power prices or stabilize them, and the magnitude of such changes, is important to anticipate macroeconomic volatility and manage it.

The findings

We define and estimate the (beta)-sensitivity metric, the increase in the annual average price of electricity when the price of natural gas increases by 1 euro per MWh. Achieving the 2030 capacities foreseen in system operators’ resource adequacy assessments in all EU countries, the UK and Switzerland would reduce the average European (beta)-sensitivity from 1.4 to 1.0 in 2030 (Fig. 1). Deploying solar PV and wind 30% above the targets would further reduce it to 0.5, while volatility and price spikes would also be less intense. There is substantial heterogeneity across countries. The mechanisms that stabilize prices also result in lower revenues for renewable plants, limiting the potential market-based penetration of these technologies. Private agents are unlikely to account for the societal value of lower macroeconomic volatility. Energy planning, market design, and support policies in Europe should consider this ‘insurance value’ of renewables explicitly, in addition to their benefits for climate mitigation.

Fig. 1: European average β-sensitivity of annual electricity price to a 1 euro change in the price of natural gas.
figure 1

The figure represents the relationship between β-sensitivity of electricity prices and renewable capacity by 2030. The vertical axis represents the European average β-sensitivity, which measures the expected increase in the annual price of electricity when the price of natural gas increases by 1 euro. The horizontal axis represents the percent over or under achievement of the indicative targets for wind and solar PV capacity in the National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) of all Member States (plus European Resource Adequacy Assessment forecasts for the UK and Switzerland). For example, 0.2 means that the simulated variable renewable capacity is 20% higher in each country than envisioned in the NECP targets. Figure adapted from Navia Simon, D. & Anadon, L. D. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01704-0 (2025) under a Creative Commons licence CC BY 4.0.

Full size image

The study

We use a detailed model to simulate price outcomes of European electricity markets at high resolution, given power capacities for each technology and fuel prices and considering factors like the interconnection capabilities across countries, the availability of hydro generation, solar and wind capacity factors. We simulate electricity prices for random scenarios that reflect the historical variation in fuel prices, electricity demand and weather-related conditions. We construct the distribution of these simulated annual prices for the indicative 2030 capacity targets of the 27 EU countries, plus the UK and Switzerland, and compare it with the price distribution resulting from current capacities. We also simulate faster deployment of solar PV and wind technologies, beyond 2030 plans.

Related Articles

Power price stability and the insurance value of renewable technologies

To understand if renewables stabilize or destabilize electricity prices, we simulate European power markets as projected by the National Energy and Climate Plans for 2030 but replicating the historical variability in electricity demand, the prices of fossil fuels and weather. We propose a β-sensitivity metric, defined as the projected increase in the average annual price of electricity when the price of natural gas increases by 1 euro. We show that annual power prices spikes would be more moderate because the β-sensitivity would fall from 1.4 euros to 1 euro. Deployment of solar photovoltaic and wind technologies exceeding 30% of the 2030 target would lower it further, below 0.5 euros. Our framework shows that this stabilization of prices would produce social welfare gains, that is, we find an insurance value of renewables. Because market mechanisms do not internalize this value, we argue that it should be explicitly considered in energy policy decisions.

Diversity of biomass usage pathways to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system

Biomass is a versatile renewable energy source with applications across the energy system, but it is a limited resource and its usage needs prioritization. We use a sector-coupled European energy system model to explore near-optimal solutions for achieving emissions targets. We find that provision of biogenic carbon has higher value than bioenergy provision. Energy system costs increase by 20% if biomass is excluded at a net-negative (−110%) emissions target and by 14% at a net-zero target. Dispatchable bioelectricity covering ~1% of total electricity generation strengthens supply reliability. Otherwise, it is not crucial in which sector biomass is used, if combined with carbon capture to enable negative emissions and feedstock for e-fuel production. A shortage of renewable electricity or hydrogen supply primarily increases the value of using biomass for fuel production. Results are sensitive to upstream emissions of biomass, carbon sequestration capacity and costs of direct air capture.

Solar-driven interfacial evaporation technologies for food, energy and water

Solar-driven interfacial evaporation technologies use solar energy to heat materials that drive water evaporation. These technologies are versatile and do not require electricity, which enables their potential application across the food, energy and water nexus. In this Review, we assess the potential of solar-driven interfacial evaporation technologies in food, energy and clean-water production, in wastewater treatment, and in resource recovery. Interfacial evaporation technologies can produce up to 5.3 l m–2 h−1 of drinking water using sunlight as the energy source. Systems designed for food production in coastal regions desalinate water to irrigate crops or wash contaminated soils. Technologies are being developed to simultaneously produce both clean energy and water through interfacial evaporation and have reached up to 204 W m–2 for electricity and 2.5 l m–2 h–1 for water in separate systems. Other solar evaporation approaches or combinations of approaches could potentially use the full solar spectrum to generate multiple products (such as water, food, electricity, heating or cooling, and/or fuels). In the future, solar evaporation technologies could aid in food, energy and water provision in low-resource or rural settings that lack reliable access to these essentials, but the systems must first undergo rigorous, scaled-up field testing to understand their performance, stability and competitiveness.

Advancing robust all-weather desalination: a critical review of emerging photothermal evaporators and hybrid systems

All-weather solar-driven desalination systems, integrating photothermal evaporators with hybrid technologies, present a sustainable, cost-effective, and high-efficiency strategy for freshwater production. Despite significant advancements, previous reviews have predominantly focused on daytime evaporation, neglecting the broader scope of all-weather seawater evaporation. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the current status of all-weather seawater evaporators and their hybrid systems. Initially, the review details the system’s composition and operating principles, as well as the design criteria for high-performance evaporators. It then goes over various common photothermal conversion materials for seawater desalination, with a particular emphasis on those materials tailored for all-weather applications. It also offers an in-depth overview to the developed photothermal hybrid systems for all-weather seawater evaporation, including their working principles, the efficiency of evaporation across the day-night cycle, and their practical applications. Lastly, the existing challenges and potential research opportunities are thoroughly discussed.

The risk effects of corporate digitalization: exacerbate or mitigate?

This study elaborates on the risk effects of corporate digital transformation (CDT). Using the ratio of added value of digital assets to total intangible assets as a measure of CDT, this study overall reveals an inverse relationship between CDT and revenue volatility, even after employing a range of technical techniques to address potential endogeneity. Heterogeneity analysis highlights that the firms with small size, high capital intensity, and high agency costs benefit more from CDT. It also reveals that advancing information infrastructure, intellectual property protection, and digital taxation enhances the effectiveness of CDT. Mechanism analysis uncovers that CDT not only enhances financial advantages such as bolstering core business and mitigating non-business risks but also fosters non-financial advantages like improving corporate governance and ESG performance. Further inquiries into the side effects of CDT and the dynamics of revenue volatility indicate that CDT might compromise cash flow availability. Excessive digital investments exacerbate operating risks. Importantly, the reduction in operating risk associated with CDT does not sacrifice the potential for enhanced company performance; rather, it appears to augment the value of real options.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *