PSMB4: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for depression, perspective from integration analysis of depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome

PSMB4: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for depression, perspective from integration analysis of depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome

Introduction

Depression is a common mental disorders that affects over 300 million people worldwide [1]. with an estimated heritability of 30–40% [2]. Several large scale Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been conducted to identify common genetic variants that contribute to depression risk [3,4,5,6]. For example, Wray et al. recruited a major depression GWAS cohort (n = 135,458 cases, n = 344,901 controls) and reported 44 Genome-wide significant (GWS) loci [6]. By extending a broader phenotype definition, Howard et al. reported 102 risk loci for depression in a larger cohort (246,363 cases, 561,190 controls) [3]. but most of these are located in non-coding regions, and the molecular mechanisms underlying their effects are not well understood [3,4,5,6]. Recent advances in multi-omics data integration have provided new opportunities to study the genetic and molecular basis of depression [7,8,9,10]. Dall’Aglio et al. and Li et al. performed transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) for depression to delineate the gene expression dysregulation respectively [7, 8]. Wingo et al. and Liu et al. conducted proteome-wide association study (PWAS) in human brain tissues to identify protein abundance changes that related depression [9, 10]. These TWASs and PWASs nominated a number of risk genes (e.g. TCTEX1D1, DRD2) and proteins (e.g. CTNND1, RAB27B) for depression which advancing the etiology and therapeutic studies for depression.

However, most of these studies have focused on brain tissues. Human plasma proteome are proteins in the circulation systems which participate in various biological process including immune reaction, signal transduction and etc [11]. Plasma proteome is a major source of human drug target [12, 13], and biomarker for many diseases including psychiatric disorders [14,15,16,17]. Multiple large-scale human plasma proteome studies had been reported and released in recent years which open new avenues for studying plasma proteome and human complex traits/diseases [15, 18,19,20,21]. Accounting for human plasma proteome is valuable for diseases’ diagnosis, etiology and therapeutic, a survey of human plasma proteome and depression is needed.

In this study, I performed a PWAS analysis by integrating depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome data to identify risk proteins that may be associated with depression risk. I identified four candidate proteins including BTN3A3, PSMB4, TIMP4, and ITIH1. In addition, I found that BTN3A3 and PSMB4 play a causal role in depression, as confirmed by colocalization and Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis. By compared this plasma PWAS findings and published human brain proteome findings of depression [10, 22, 23], I further confirmed PSMB4 may act as a promising candidate biomarker and therapeutic target for depression.

Materials and methods

GWAS summary statistics

I obtained GWAS summary statistics from Howard et al. [3], which integrated data from three large cohorts (PGC, UK Biobank, and 23andMe) with a total sample size of 807,553 individuals (246,363 cases and 561,190 controls). I downloaded the summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) website (https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/), excluding the 23andMe samples (N = 500,199, including 170,756 cases and 329,443 controls).

Human plasma proteome data

I used a human plasma proteome data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study [21], which quantified 4657 proteins in 7213 individuals of European American ancestry using modified aptamers (SOMAers). Cis-pQTLs were identified by QTLtools, a total of 2004 significant SOMAers were identified in the European American population.

Plasma proteome-wide association study

I performed a PWAS analysis using FUSION software (http://gusevlab.org/projects/fusion/) [24]. I downloaded plasma PWAS weight files from http://nilanjanchatterjeelab.org/pwas, selecting only the European American population to match the ancestry of the depression GWAS and PWAS weights.

I performed colocalization analysis using the R COLOC package implemented in the FUSION pipeline with the –coloc_P flag. To determine whether the pQTL association signal and GWAS association signal were driven by the same SNP, I utilized COLOC analysis PP4 (post probability of alternative hypothesis 4, with a value between 0 and 1) to indicate whether the two signals are colocalized.

Locuszoom

I used genetic associations between genetic variants and depression extracted from the released depression GWAS summary statistics. Considering the shared genetics between psychiatry diseases [25], I downloaded schizophrenia (67,390 cases and 94,015 controls) and bipolar (41,917 cases, 371,549 controls) GWAS summary statistics respectively to plot the genetic association signals for the target regions [26, 27]. I visualized these associations using the Locuszoom website (http://locuszoom.org/) [28], selecting the European population as the reference population.

Mendelian randomization

I confirmed the causal relationship between the candidate plasma proteins that identified by PWAS using Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis. I performed two sample MR analysis using TwoSampleMR R package (https://github.com/MRCIEU/TwoSampleMR).

I used human plasma protein QTLs (pQTLs) from the above analysis as instrumental variables in the MR analysis, retaining only pQTLs with association P values under 5 × 10−08 to avoid weak instrument effects. I also performed linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumping when performed MR with default parameters (clump_r2 = 0.001; pop = “EUR”). I applied Inverse variance weighted (IVW) in MR analysis if there were more than one pQTL instruments of a protein while Wald ratio was used if there was only one pQTL instrument for a protein.

Gene and protein expression analysis

I retrieved tissue gene expression data from the GTEx website(https://www.gtexportal.org/) [29], and spatio-temporal gene expression data across human brain development stages from the Human Brain Transcriptome (HBT) website (https://hbatlas.org/) [30]. I queried protein abundance of risk genes on the Human Protein Atlas (www.proteinatlas.org) [31] and performed single-cell gene expression analysis using CoDEx (Cortical Development Expression Viewer, http://solo.bmap.ucla.edu/shiny/webapp/) [32].

Drug-gene interaction analysis

I used DGIdb (The Drug Gene Interaction Database) to explore potential drugs that target the risk proteins I identified in this study [33]. I queried detailed drug information on the DRUGBANK (https://go.drugbank.com/) [34].

Results

Plasma PWAS identified 4 proteins significantly associated with depression

To identify protein abundance alterations that related to depression, I performed a PWAS analysis by integrating depression GWAS and human plasma proteome data. I identified 7 proteins in total at FDR < 0.1, including PSMB4, TIMP4, ITIH1, BTN3A3, ACAA1, SERPING1 and B3GAT3 (Fig. 1; Table 1). Among these proteins, BTN3A3 (P value = 6.41 × 10−06), PSMB4 (P value = 1.42 × 10−05), TIMP4 (P value = 3.77 × 10−05) and ITIH1 (P value = 7.86 × 10−05) are strongly associated with depression (FDR < 0.05). BTN3A3, which is located in the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, showed the most significant association with depression in the PWAS analysis. I also checked the original GWAS association results of the four identified proteins with FDR < 0.05 and found that only genomic loci around the BTN3A3 region reach genome wide significant level while genomic regions around PSMB4, TIMP4 and ITIH1 did not (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1: The Manhattan plot of plasma proteome-wide association study for depression.
PSMB4: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for depression, perspective from integration analysis of depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome

The red dashed line indicates FDR = 0.05 and the blue dashed line indicates FDR = 0.1.

Full size image
Table 1 Plasma PWAS result of depression.
Full size table
Fig. 2: The locuszoom plots of four genetic loci of depression GWAS (sample size N = 500,199, 170,756 cases and 329,443 controls).
figure 2

a BTN3A3. b PSMB4. c ITIH1. d TIMP4.

Full size image

Colocalization analysis indicated BTN3A3 and PSMB4’s causal role for depression

To test whether the genetic association of protein and association of depression are colocalized, I performed colocalization analysis. Among the 7 risk proteins (FDR < 0.1) I identified, BTN3A3 (PP4 = 0.96) and PSMB4 (PP4 = 0.91) showed the highest posterior probability (Table 1). These results indicate that the genetic variants confer risk for depression via affecting protein abundance of BTN3A3 and PSMB4.

Mendelian randomization confirmed BTN3A3 and PSMB4 are causal protein for depression

I performed MR analysis to further confirm the causal relationship between human plasma protein abundance and depression (Fig. 3a). Only the 7 risk proteins I identified in the PWAS analysis were included in further MR analysis. Five proteins, including BTN3A3, PSMB4, TIMP4, ACCA1 and B3GAT3, showed significant association with depression (Table 2). BTN3A3 (MR P value = 9.19 × 10−06) showed the highest association with depression, while PSMB4 (MR P value = 2.65 × 10−04) also showed a significant association with depression (Fig. 3b, c; Table 2). These results, together with the PWAS and colocalization analysis, supported the causal role of protein BTN3A3 and PSMB4 in human plasma with depression.

Fig. 3: The Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis for PSMB4 and BTN3A3.
figure 3

a The overall MR design. b, c The MR analysis result of PSMB4 and BTN3A3. d The comparison between this plasma proteome-wide association study result and published depression proteome-wide association studies and proteome-wide MR studies that using human brain proteome pQTL. A dataset (proteome-wide association study result of this study), B dataset (Wingo et al. [10]), C dataset (Liu et al. [9] and Deng et al. [22]).

Full size image
Table 2 Mendelian randomization analysis result for candidate PWAS identified proteins of depression.
Full size table

Gene and protein expression pattern of BTN3A3 and PSMB4

I further explored the gene and protein expression of BTN3A3 and PSMB4. BTN3A3 and PSMB4 showed a universal expression pattern across the GTEx tissues (Figure S1, S2), and the same pattern was also observed as for protein abundance (Figure S3, S4). BTN3A3 showed an increasing expression during prenatal and stable in postnatal stages while PSMB4 showed a consistent expression level during all brain development stages (Figure S5, S6). PSMB4 is expressed among most of the brain cell types (Figure S9cin Liu et al.) [23] while BTN3A3 is rarely expressed in a specific cell type (Figure S7).

Drug-gene interaction analysis of BTN3A3 and PSMB4

I found 5 drugs (CARFILZOMIB, MARIZOMIB, BORTEZOMIB, IXAZOMIB CITRATE, OPROZOMIB) that had direct interaction with PSMB4, and no result was found for BTN3A3 (Table S1). Among these drugs, CARFILZOMIB, BORTEZOMIB and IXAZOMIB CITRATE are FDA approved drugs used for multiple myeloma treatment, MARIZOMIB was under its Phase 3 clinical trial for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) treatment, and OPROZOMIB was under its Phase 1 clinical trial (Table S1). These results highlight further drug repurposing opportunities for depression treatment targeting PSMB4.

Compare with previous studies further confirmed PSMB4 is a risk protein for depression

Several papers have been published investigating protein abundance in relation to depression. Wingo et al. [10] conducted a PWAS for depression and identified 25 risk proteins, Deng et al. [22] performed a proteome-wide MR analysis for depression and nominated 10 proteins, and Liu et al. conducted an MR analysis focusing on known drug targets for depression and identified 6 risk proteins for depression [23]. These studies primarily focused on integrating depression GWAS and brain proteome data. To determine whether there are robust protein abundance changes between the human plasma proteome and the human brain proteome, I compared the plasma PWAS results with previous studies. These results show that the PSMB4 protein is supported by all these studies, further demonstrating PSMB4 is a promising candidate for depression risk (Fig. 3d).

Discussion

The plasma PWAS analysis aimed to identify aberrant protein abundance changes associated with depression. I identified four plasma proteins (BTN3A3, PSMB4, TIMP4, and ITIH1) that were significantly associated with depression at FDR < 0.05. I further confirmed the causal role of BTN3A3 and PSMB4 in depression using colocalization and MR analysis. A recent plasma proteome pQTL MR study also highlighted the importance of BTN3A3 in three psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression [35]. Additionally, PSMB4 was identified as a transcriptome-wide significant candidate, as reported by Li et al. [8]. Considering the shared genetic between psychiatric diseases [25], I also examined the association of genetic variants near PSMB4 with schizophrenia and bipolar respectively, the lead SNPs for Schizophrenia is rs6684085 (P = 1.88 × 10−05, Figure S8), while the lead SNP for bipolar disorder is rs112766034 (P = 2.22 × 10−04, Figure S9). By comparing this study results with previously published studies for depression that used human brain pQTL datasets, I found convergent evidences supporting PSMB4 as a candidate risk protein in both human brain and blood. This emphasized that PSMB4 may serve as a promising biomarker and potential therapeutic drug target of depression. PSMB4 is a subunit of the 26S proteasome [36], which participate in many biological processes and diseases such as inhibiting cardiomyocyte apoptosis [37], melanoma [38] and breast cancer [39]. I also identified several FDA approved drugs or drugs in clinical trials (e.g. CARFILZOMIB, BORTEZOMIB) that targeting PSMB4, providing further drug repurposing opportunities for depression by targeting PSMB4.

However, this study has several limitations. Firstly, I only focused on the European ancestry proteome and depression GWAS data, and multi-ancestry data should be included in future studies. Secondly, the original study including 23andme cohort, but this data was not available in the current study, and further studies with larger GWAS sample size is needed. Lastly, this study is primarily a computational work, and further experimental validation and exploration are needed to uncover the mechanism of these risk proteins for depression.

In summary, this plasma PWAS analysis identified four plasma proteins significantly associated with depression. Among these proteins, PSMB4 and BTN3A3 may play a causal role in depression based on the coloclization and MR analysis, I also identified drug repurposing opportunities for depression targeting PSMB4. The results provided new potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for depression and highlight the important role of PSMB4 in depression, which warrants further mechanistic exploration.

Related Articles

Depression symptom-specific genetic associations in clinically diagnosed and proxy case Alzheimer’s disease

Depression is a risk factor for the later development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but evidence for the genetic relationship is mixed. Assessing depression symptom-specific genetic associations may better clarify this relationship. To address this, we conducted genome-wide meta-analysis (a genome-wide association study, GWAS) of the nine depression symptom items, plus their sum score, on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (GWAS-equivalent N: 224,535–308,421) using data from UK Biobank, the GLAD study and PROTECT, identifying 37 genomic risk loci. Using six AD GWASs with varying proportions of clinical and proxy (family history) case ascertainment, we identified 20 significant genetic correlations with depression/depression symptoms. However, only one of these was identified with a clinical AD GWAS. Local genetic correlations were detected in 14 regions. No statistical colocalization was identified in these regions. However, the region of the transmembrane protein 106B gene (TMEM106B) showed colocalization between multiple depression phenotypes and both clinical-only and clinical + proxy AD. Mendelian randomization and polygenic risk score analyses did not yield significant results after multiple testing correction in either direction. Our findings do not demonstrate a causal role of depression/depression symptoms on AD and suggest that previous evidence of genetic overlap between depression and AD may be driven by the inclusion of family history-based proxy cases/controls. However, colocalization at TMEM106B warrants further investigation.

Energy metabolism in health and diseases

Energy metabolism is indispensable for sustaining physiological functions in living organisms and assumes a pivotal role across physiological and pathological conditions. This review provides an extensive overview of advancements in energy metabolism research, elucidating critical pathways such as glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and amino acid metabolism, along with their intricate regulatory mechanisms. The homeostatic balance of these processes is crucial; however, in pathological states such as neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer, extensive metabolic reprogramming occurs, resulting in impaired glucose metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction, which accelerate disease progression. Recent investigations into key regulatory pathways, including mechanistic target of rapamycin, sirtuins, and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, have considerably deepened our understanding of metabolic dysregulation and opened new avenues for therapeutic innovation. Emerging technologies, such as fluorescent probes, nano-biomaterials, and metabolomic analyses, promise substantial improvements in diagnostic precision. This review critically examines recent advancements and ongoing challenges in metabolism research, emphasizing its potential for precision diagnostics and personalized therapeutic interventions. Future studies should prioritize unraveling the regulatory mechanisms of energy metabolism and the dynamics of intercellular energy interactions. Integrating cutting-edge gene-editing technologies and multi-omics approaches, the development of multi-target pharmaceuticals in synergy with existing therapies such as immunotherapy and dietary interventions could enhance therapeutic efficacy. Personalized metabolic analysis is indispensable for crafting tailored treatment protocols, ultimately providing more accurate medical solutions for patients. This review aims to deepen the understanding and improve the application of energy metabolism to drive innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets

Macrophages are immune cells belonging to the mononuclear phagocyte system. They play crucial roles in immune defense, surveillance, and homeostasis. This review systematically discusses the types of hematopoietic progenitors that give rise to macrophages, including primitive hematopoietic progenitors, erythro-myeloid progenitors, and hematopoietic stem cells. These progenitors have distinct genetic backgrounds and developmental processes. Accordingly, macrophages exhibit complex and diverse functions in the body, including phagocytosis and clearance of cellular debris, antigen presentation, and immune response, regulation of inflammation and cytokine production, tissue remodeling and repair, and multi-level regulatory signaling pathways/crosstalk involved in homeostasis and physiology. Besides, tumor-associated macrophages are a key component of the TME, exhibiting both anti-tumor and pro-tumor properties. Furthermore, the functional status of macrophages is closely linked to the development of various diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic conditions, and trauma. Targeting macrophages has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in these contexts. Clinical trials of macrophage-based targeted drugs, macrophage-based immunotherapies, and nanoparticle-based therapy were comprehensively summarized. Potential challenges and future directions in targeting macrophages have also been discussed. Overall, our review highlights the significance of this versatile immune cell in human health and disease, which is expected to inform future research and clinical practice.

Whole-genome sequencing analysis identifies rare, large-effect noncoding variants and regulatory regions associated with circulating protein levels

The contribution of rare noncoding genetic variation to common phenotypes is largely unknown, as a result of a historical lack of population-scale whole-genome sequencing data and the difficulty of categorizing noncoding variants into functionally similar groups. To begin addressing these challenges, we performed a cis association analysis using whole-genome sequencing data, consisting of 1.1 billion variants, 123 million noncoding aggregate-based tests and 2,907 circulating protein levels in ~50,000 UK Biobank participants. We identified 604 independent rare noncoding single-variant associations with circulating protein levels. Unlike protein-coding variation, rare noncoding genetic variation was almost as likely to increase or decrease protein levels. Rare noncoding aggregate testing identified 357 conditionally independent associated regions. Of these, 74 (21%) were not detectable by single-variant testing alone. Our findings have important implications for the identification, and role, of rare noncoding genetic variation associated with common human phenotypes, including the importance of testing aggregates of noncoding variants.

Advance in peptide-based drug development: delivery platforms, therapeutics and vaccines

The successful approval of peptide-based drugs can be attributed to a collaborative effort across multiple disciplines. The integration of novel drug design and synthesis techniques, display library technology, delivery systems, bioengineering advancements, and artificial intelligence have significantly expedited the development of groundbreaking peptide-based drugs, effectively addressing the obstacles associated with their character, such as the rapid clearance and degradation, necessitating subcutaneous injection leading to increasing patient discomfort, and ultimately advancing translational research efforts. Peptides are presently employed in the management and diagnosis of a diverse array of medical conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, weight loss, oncology, and rare diseases, and are additionally garnering interest in facilitating targeted drug delivery platforms and the advancement of peptide-based vaccines. This paper provides an overview of the present market and clinical trial progress of peptide-based therapeutics, delivery platforms, and vaccines. It examines the key areas of research in peptide-based drug development through a literature analysis and emphasizes the structural modification principles of peptide-based drugs, as well as the recent advancements in screening, design, and delivery technologies. The accelerated advancement in the development of novel peptide-based therapeutics, including peptide-drug complexes, new peptide-based vaccines, and innovative peptide-based diagnostic reagents, has the potential to promote the era of precise customization of disease therapeutic schedule.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *