The threat of avian influenza H5N1 looms over global biodiversity

Implications for conservation

Worryingly, 16% of wild bird species and 27% of mammal species with known H5N1 infections as of 2024 are already of conservation concern (specifically, listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as either near threatened, vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered) owing to other anthropogenic threats (Fig. 1c) (data from WAHIS). In some species, a substantial fraction of global or regional populations was lost to H5N1. For example, over 20% of the Chilean population of Humboldt penguins (listed as vulnerable) presumably died of H5N1 in 2023 (ref. 11). Extremely concerning is the 2024 arrival of the virus in islands surrounding Antarctica, where a large fraction of the population of threatened species live, such as the vulnerable wandering albatross (as recorded by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR)). Influenza viruses are listed by the IUCN as a threat for only 12% of the threatened species that already been infected, which is something that must be reevaluated now that spatial spread and mortality are increasing.

The unexpected threat of pathogens such as H5N1 can compromise many years of in situ and ex situ conservation efforts. One paradigmatic case is the California condor, a critically endangered species that has been captive-reared for decades to recover its once-almost-extinct global population. H5N1 presumably killed 21 condors in 2023 — more than 6% of the wild population12. The critical situation of this species led specialists to start vaccinating the birds against avian flu to reduce further mortalities12. Captive individuals of threatened species (including Andean condors and lions) were infected in zoos and rehabilitation centres that are working on ex situ conservation (data from WAHIS).

It has become evident that remote protected areas cannot shelter species from the threat of H5N1. For example, numerous individuals of several species — including Peruvian pelicans, Peruvian boobies and sea lions — died within just a few weeks during the austral summer 2022–2023 in remote protected areas of Peru6 (Fig. 1a). Emerging pathogens such as H5N1, fuelled by anthropogenic drivers, can travel fast and wide around the world to affect wildlife in remote areas that were previously assumed safe.

The persistence of populations of long-lived, low-reproduction species such as albatrosses, penguins and condors largely depends on high survival rates. A sudden threat that eliminates a large proportion of the population can severely hamper persistence. Although mortality is evident immediately, the sublethal effects of the virus (for instance, on movement and breeding behaviour13) might only be apparent in the future. The unprecedented speed and scale of such virus-related mortalities leave little time for design and implementation of conservation interventions.

Implications for ecosystem function and services

Mass mortality events have repercussions for ecological processes beyond the effects on individual species. The ephemeral resource pulse from animal carcasses produced by the H5N1 virus could modify the abundance, demography and movement behaviour of generalist facultative scavengers, which has downstream effects on species interactions. For example, a higher availability of carcasses can favour the presence and abundance of pests, which also affects interactions with other animals and human health14.

Losses of top predators and scavengers can be particularly impactful for ecosystem function via trophic cascades (for example, by mesopredator release)15. H5N1-driven mortalities of carnivores such as sea lions, boobies, penguins and pelicans might modulate prey demography and behaviour, as well as nutrient cycling and ecosystem structure of coastal environments. Scavengers are efficient carcass cleaners, so reduced populations could lead to higher risk of pathogen spillover and an increase in the abundance of pests that take advantage of carcasses14. These potential ecosystem effects of such sudden, widespread top-predator mortalities caused by H5N1 require further research, such as the implementation of population and community models to evaluate potential cascading effects on ecological interactions.

Apart from the intrinsic value of the wildlife being lost and the potential for concerning changes in ecosystem function, ecosystem services could be compromised by the loss of wildlife. For example, the loss of marine birds could result in lower availability of guano, an important source of fertilizer for some communities6,9. The potential ecological changes in marine coastal ecosystems15 could modify food and other provisioning services to local fishers or seaweed collectors. The service of ecotourism could be impaired by the loss of pinnipeds and marine birds (for example, penguins) in some regions, including Antarctica. Cultural services such as recreation, relaxation, leisure and spiritual enrichment could also be affected. Potential effects of ecosystem service losses should be assessed by scientists from the social and natural sciences together with Indigenous people, local communities and other stakeholders who are affected.

Science and policy needs

The magnitude of H5N1’s direct and indirect effects on species, ecosystems and human health and well-being are uncertain. Progress is needed in both basic research and policy — especially transboundary management. The most critical research need is to address the pervasive knowledge gap about the virus’s actual effects, particularly in understudied and biodiverse regions such as central Africa (Fig. 1a). Monitoring should escalate in marine birds and mammals, as well as terrestrial scavengers, because those groups appear to be infected at the highest rates. Monitoring birds whose flyways include currently unaffected regions is also urgently needed. Mapping the risk of H5N1 infection would help to prioritize surveillance efforts and minimize the effects if the virus eventually spreads to new regions. Vaccination of threatened species against avian flu should be debated and considered, but is only likely to be feasible in specific cases. Knowledge of animal ecology, particularly animal movement, and its influence on H5N1 spread is necessary to predict the evolution of the virus and the potential efficacy of interventions.

In terms of policy, global collaboration is essential for surveillance, early diagnosis, monitoring, sharing of information and provision of financial and technical instruments, particularly in disadvantaged areas. Currently, several international organizations (such as OFFLU, European Food Safety Authority, and SCAR) are working to improve information sharing. However, in many regions, the lack of funds and infrastructure for testing and monitoring are challenges that are difficult to overcome.

The root cause of this pathogen’s emergence, spread and spillover must be addressed through changes to food production systems and consumption patterns2. Separating wildlife from existing intensive production systems that boost the virus virulence and transmission would help in the short term. However, deeper transformative changes are required, such as making food production systems healthier and more sustainable. In a globalized and interconnected world, any strategy to deal with threats such as H5N1 must stress the connection between nature and people (namely, a One Health approach), given that disconnection will continue to precipitate biodiversity loss.

Related Articles

Coastal wetland resilience through local, regional and global conservation

Coastal wetlands, including tidal marshes, mangrove forests and tidal flats, support the livelihoods of millions of people. Understanding the resilience of coastal wetlands to the increasing number and intensity of anthropogenic threats (such as habitat conversion, pollution, fishing and climate change) can inform what conservation actions will be effective. In this Review, we synthesize anthropogenic threats to coastal wetlands and their resilience through the lens of scale. Over decades and centuries, anthropogenic threats have unfolded across local, regional and global scales, reducing both the extent and quality of coastal wetlands. The resilience of existing coastal wetlands is driven by their quality, which is modulated by both physical conditions (such as sediment supply) and ecological conditions (such as species interactions operating from local through to global scales). Protection and restoration efforts, however, are often localized and focus on the extent of coastal wetlands. The future of coastal wetlands will depend on an improved understanding of their resilience, and on society’s actions to enhance both their extent and quality across different scales.

Pathogens and planetary change

Emerging infectious diseases, biodiversity loss, and anthropogenic environmental change are interconnected crises with massive social and ecological costs. In this Review, we discuss how pathogens and parasites are responding to global change, and the implications for pandemic prevention and biodiversity conservation. Ecological and evolutionary principles help to explain why both pandemics and wildlife die-offs are becoming more common; why land-use change and biodiversity loss are often followed by an increase in zoonotic and vector-borne diseases; and why some species, such as bats, host so many emerging pathogens. To prevent the next pandemic, scientists should focus on monitoring and limiting the spread of a handful of high-risk viruses, especially at key interfaces such as farms and live-animal markets. But to address the much broader set of infectious disease risks associated with the Anthropocene, decision-makers will need to develop comprehensive strategies that include pathogen surveillance across species and ecosystems; conservation-based interventions to reduce human–animal contact and protect wildlife health; health system strengthening; and global improvements in epidemic preparedness and response. Scientists can contribute to these efforts by filling global gaps in disease data, and by expanding the evidence base for disease–driver relationships and ecological interventions.

Insights from a century of data reveal global trends in ex situ living plant collections

Ex situ living plant collections play a crucial role in providing nature-based solutions to twenty-first century global challenges. However, the complex dynamics of these artificial ecosystems are poorly quantified and understood, affecting biodiversity storage, conservation and utilization. To evaluate the management of ex situ plant diversity, we analysed a century of data comprising 2.2 million records, from a meta-collection currently holding ~500,000 accessions and 41% of global ex situ species diversity. Our study provides critical insights into the historical evolution, current state and future trajectory of global living collections. We reveal sigmoidal growth of a meta-collection that has reached capacity in both total accessions and total diversity, and identify intrinsic constraints on biodiversity management, including a median survival probability of 15 years. We explore the impact of external constraints and quantify the influence of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which we link to reduced acquisition of wild-origin and internationally sourced material by 44% and 38%, respectively. We further define the impact of these constraints on ex situ conservation but highlight targeted initiatives that successfully mitigate these challenges. Ultimately, our study underscores the urgent need for strategic prioritization and the re-evaluation of ex situ biodiversity management to achieve both scientific and conservation goals.

Biodiversity offsets, their effectiveness and their role in a nature positive future

Biodiversity offsetting is a mechanism for addressing the impacts of development projects on biodiversity, but the practice remains controversial and its effectiveness generally poor. In the context of the Global Biodiversity Framework and the emergence of new approaches for mitigating damage, we need to learn from the past. In this Review, we explore biodiversity offsetting, its effectiveness and its future prospects, especially in relation to ‘nature positive’ goals. Offsets often fall short of their stated goal: to achieve at least no net loss of affected biodiversity. However, such failures are prominent because offsets have more explicit quantitative objectives than most other conservation approaches, whose effectiveness is also variable. These clear objectives provide the potential for the transparency that alternative approaches to addressing negative human impacts on biodiversity lack. Unfortunately, promising alternatives are scarce, so offsetting and offset-like mechanisms remain a necessary component of strategies to halt and reverse nature loss. However, improving their performance is essential. No quick and easy solution exists; instead, upholding best practice principles and rigorous implementation — including in the face of challenges from opposing narratives and interest groups — remains key.

Seasonal regimes of warm Circumpolar Deep Water intrusion toward Antarctic ice shelves

Basal melting of Antarctic ice shelves is primarily driven by heat delivery from warm Circumpolar Deep Water. Here we classify near-shelf water masses in an eddy-resolving numerical model of the Southern Ocean to develop a unified view of warm water intrusion onto the Antarctic continental shelf. We identify four regimes on seasonal timescales. In regime 1 (East Antarctica), heat intrusions are driven by easterly winds via Ekman dynamics. In regime 2 (West Antarctica), intrusion is primarily determined by the strength of a shelf-break undercurrent. In regime 3, the warm water cycle on the shelf is in antiphase with dense shelf water production (Adélie Coast). Finally, in regime 4 (Weddell and Ross seas), shelf-ward warm water inflow occurs along the western edge of canyons during periods of dense shelf water outflow. Our results advocate for a reformulation of the traditional annual-mean regime classification of the Antarctic continental shelf.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *