Using oncolytic viruses to induce hyperacute rejection against cancer
Related Articles
Ferroptosis enhances the therapeutic potential of oncolytic adenoviruses KD01 against cancer
Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment by selectively targeting and lysing tumor cells. However, its efficacy is often limited in certain tumor types due to multiple factors. This study explores the combination of oncolytic adenoviruses with Erastin, a potent ferroptosis inducer, to enhance antitumor efficacy in oncolytic virus-insensitive cancer cell lines. In vitro experiments demonstrated that Erastin significantly increased the cytotoxicity of oncolytic virotherapy, leading to greater inhibition of cell proliferation and elevated rates of cell death compared to monotherapies. The combination treatment further promoted ferroptosis, as evidenced by increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, enhanced lipid peroxidation, and disrupted redox homeostasis. RNA sequencing identified the downregulation of Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) as a key mediator of the enhanced ferroptotic effect. Restoring the expression of DKK1 partially mitigated the cytotoxic effects of the combination therapy, highlighting its crucial role in mediating the enhanced ferroptosis-induced oncolytic virotherapy efficacy. In vivo studies further validated these findings, demonstrating that the combined treatment significantly reduced tumor growth without inducing notable toxicity. This novel therapeutic approach has great potential to enhance the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy in cancers resistant to oncolytic viruses by inducing ferroptosis. Further investigation in clinically relevant models is warranted to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to optimize this combination strategy for potential clinical applications.
Deubiquitination enzyme USP35 negatively regulates MAVS signaling to inhibit anti-tumor immunity
The RIG-I/MAVS signaling stimulates anti-tumor immunity by triggering the production of inflammatory cytokines. Activation of MAVS induced by viral RNA and RIG-I binding is critical in this pathway. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of MAVS activity and its function in anti-tumor immunity is not fully understood. Here, we report that the ubiquitin-specific protease 35 (USP35) negatively regulates the MAVS signaling. Mechanistically, USP35 interacts with MAVS and removes its K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, thereby inhibiting viral-induced MAVS-TBK1-IRF3 activation and downstream inflammatory gene expression. Importantly, depletion of USP35 significantly enhances the anti-tumor immunity and synergizes with oncolytic virotherapy to suppress xenograft tumor growth of melanoma cells. Thus, our study identifies USP35 as a negative regulator of MAVS signaling, representing a potential immunosuppressive factor in cutaneous melanoma.
Enhancer reprogramming: critical roles in cancer and promising therapeutic strategies
Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer initiation and progression, driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations. Enhancer reprogramming has emerged as a pivotal driver of carcinogenesis, with cancer cells often relying on aberrant transcriptional programs. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has provided critical insights into enhancer reprogramming events and their role in malignancy. While targeting enhancers presents a promising therapeutic strategy, significant challenges remain. These include the off-target effects of enhancer-targeting technologies, the complexity and redundancy of enhancer networks, and the dynamic nature of enhancer reprogramming, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. This review comprehensively encapsulates the structural attributes of enhancers, delineates the mechanisms underlying their dysregulation in malignant transformation, and evaluates the therapeutic opportunities and limitations associated with targeting enhancers in cancer.
Genomic and transcriptomic insights into complex virus–prokaryote interactions in marine biofilms
Marine biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms that play a crucial ecological role in oceans. Although prokaryotes are the dominant members of these biofilms, little is known about their interactions with viruses. By analysing publicly available and newly sequenced metagenomic data, we identified 2446 virus–prokaryote connections in 84 marine biofilms. Most of these connections were between the bacteriophages in the Uroviricota phylum and the bacteria of Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidota. The network of virus–host pairs is complex; a single virus can infect multiple prokaryotic populations or a single prokaryote is susceptible to several viral populations. Analysis of genomes of paired prokaryotes and viruses revealed the presence of 425 putative auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs), 239 viral genes related to restriction–modification (RM) systems and 38,538 prokaryotic anti-viral defence-related genes involved in 15 defence systems. Transcriptomic evidence from newly established biofilms revealed the expression of viral genes, including AMGs and RM, and prokaryotic defence systems, indicating the active interplay between viruses and prokaryotes. A comparison between biofilms and seawater showed that biofilm prokaryotes have more abundant defence genes than seawater prokaryotes, and the defence gene composition differs between biofilms and the surrounding seawater. Overall, our study unveiled active viruses in natural biofilms and their complex interplay with prokaryotes, which may result in the blooming of defence strategists in biofilms. The detachment of bloomed defence strategists may reduce the infectivity of viruses in seawater and result in the emergence of a novel role of marine biofilms.
Targeting of TAMs: can we be more clever than cancer cells?
With increasing incidence and geography, cancer is one of the leading causes of death, reduced quality of life and disability worldwide. Principal progress in the development of new anticancer therapies, in improving the efficiency of immunotherapeutic tools, and in the personification of conventional therapies needs to consider cancer-specific and patient-specific programming of innate immunity. Intratumoral TAMs and their precursors, resident macrophages and monocytes, are principal regulators of tumor progression and therapy resistance. Our review summarizes the accumulated evidence for the subpopulations of TAMs and their increasing number of biomarkers, indicating their predictive value for the clinical parameters of carcinogenesis and therapy resistance, with a focus on solid cancers of non-infectious etiology. We present the state-of-the-art knowledge about the tumor-supporting functions of TAMs at all stages of tumor progression and highlight biomarkers, recently identified by single-cell and spatial analytical methods, that discriminate between tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting TAMs, where both subtypes express a combination of prototype M1 and M2 genes. Our review focuses on novel mechanisms involved in the crosstalk among epigenetic, signaling, transcriptional and metabolic pathways in TAMs. Particular attention has been given to the recently identified link between cancer cell metabolism and the epigenetic programming of TAMs by histone lactylation, which can be responsible for the unlimited protumoral programming of TAMs. Finally, we explain how TAMs interfere with currently used anticancer therapeutics and summarize the most advanced data from clinical trials, which we divide into four categories: inhibition of TAM survival and differentiation, inhibition of monocyte/TAM recruitment into tumors, functional reprogramming of TAMs, and genetic enhancement of macrophages.
Responses